Teams

SLKGO-Goodnough/Westport

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles League · Women 4.0 Singles 18

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-12vs SLTPE-Persinger-JettonWon 20
W#2 SinglesNathalie Naslund vs Jennifer Higgins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKatherine Trask vs Lane Wallace6-2, 6-0
2025-08-02vs SLJRI-Ritter/Jetton 18 4.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesBridgett Dedmond vs Morgan Hoecherl7-6, 7-5
2025-07-22vs SLKDU - Dugan/NMP 4.0 18Won 20
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Goodnough vs Liz Barton7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBridgett Dedmond vs Amy Barnett6-1, 6-1
2025-07-15vs SLKBI-Bienstock/Edgemoor 18 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Goodnough vs Kathleen Navola6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBridgett Dedmond vs Kristine Bienstock6-3, 6-2
2025-07-08vs SLTPE-Persinger-JettonSplit 11
W#2 SinglesNathalie Naslund vs Caroline Ray6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBridgett Dedmond vs Jennifer Higgins3-6, 2-6
2025-07-06vs SLJRI-Ritter/Jetton 18 4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesNathalie Naslund vs Ellyn Pavelka3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesKatherine Trask vs Heidi Nyquist6-0, 6-2
2025-06-17vs SLKDU - Dugan/NMP 4.0 18Won 20
W#1 SinglesKatelyn Goodnough vs Katherine Dugan6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNathalie Naslund vs Jane Rodewald6-4, 6-1
2025-06-10vs SLKBI-Bienstock/Edgemoor 18 4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesKatelyn Goodnough vs Linda Radovich4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBridgett Dedmond vs Jennifer Svienty3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 Singles 18 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Nathalie Naslund
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.77
Katelyn Goodnough
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Sunny Donoghue
published
3.52
Bridgett Dedmond
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Katherine Trask
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgett Dedmond + Katherine Trask134 matchesnot enough data
Bridgett Dedmond + Nathalie Naslund213 matchesnot enough data
Nathalie Naslund + Katelyn Goodnough303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nathalie Naslund
86W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Katelyn Goodnough
81W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Sunny Donoghue
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Bridgett Dedmond
91W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Katherine Trask
34W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.