Teams

SLKDU - Dugan/NMP 4.0 18

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles League · Women 4.0 Singles 18

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-17vs SLKBI-Bienstock/Edgemoor 18 4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesShumbriar Ostapko vs Kristine Bienstock6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Lesso vs Buket Boucher6-2
2025-07-22Won 10
W#3 SinglesKelly Lesso vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-15vs SLJRI-Ritter/Jetton 18 4.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesShumbriar Ostapko vs Morgan Hoecherl4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesWhitney Brunk vs Kristy Del Monte4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJane Rodewald vs Ann Modlin6-4, 6-4
2025-07-05vs SLTPE-Persinger-JettonLost 02
L#2 SinglesShumbriar Ostapko vs Christine Caruso3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesWhitney Brunk vs Caroline Ray4-6, 1-6
2025-07-01vs SLKBI-Bienstock/Edgemoor 18 4.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesKelly Lesso vs Linda Radovich6-4, 6-1
2025-06-23vs SLJRI-Ritter/Jetton 18 4.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesKelly Lesso vs Jana Ritter6-2, 6-2
2025-06-17vs SLKGO-Goodnough/WestportLost 02
L#2 SinglesKelly Lesso vs Sunny Donoghue3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJane Rodewald vs Nathalie Naslund4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 Singles 18 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Liz Barton
published
3.71
Kelly Lesso
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.46
Shumbriar Ostapko
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.45
Lori Fuller
published
3.44
Katherine Dugan
published
3.38
Jane Rodewald
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Amy Barnett
published 3.5
3.22
Whitney Brunk
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shumbriar Ostapko + Jane Rodewald3443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Barton
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Kelly Lesso
76W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Shumbriar Ostapko
67W–86L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Lori Fuller
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Katherine Dugan
8W–24L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Jane Rodewald
111W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Amy Barnett
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Whitney Brunk
61W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.