← Search

Jane Rodewald

Huntersville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 123W–114L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Rodewald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
L
2026-09-14 · LABA-Bates/LNRSC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jana Watt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzette Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-10 · LJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Suzette Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Earnshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · LCRI-Richards/CSD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Haigney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · TLOBA-Baker/Dziadziola/Skybrook 55+ Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · LCRI-Richards/CSD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Haigney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Mahler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · TLJRO-Rode/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · LCRI-Richards/CSD · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Spera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · MLJRO-Rodewald/Skybrook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neil McLean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · TLOBA-Baker/Dziadziola/Skybrook 55+ Tri Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eren Hendricks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.9%
69W–39L · 55.1% of games
4.0
32.4%
12W–25L · 45.6% of games
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 61% of games
7.5
45.5%
20W–24L · 48.2% of games
3.5mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
37 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe