Teams

LVWE-Weber/Skybrook

2026 Lake USTA 65 & Over League · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-16vs LKCA-Cassino/Westport 65Won 30
W#1 DoublesGina Martin / Kathy Buaron vs Kathleen Cassino / Sylvia Holley6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJane Rodewald / Denise Bost vs Zergun Golan / Shirley Pirkl6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Clark / Emily Jones vs Julie McConnell / Barbara Bischoff6-0, 6-1
2026-04-09vs LKCA-Cassino/Westport 65Won 30
W#1 DoublesGina Martin / Denise Bost vs Kathleen Cassino / Barbara Bischoff6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusie Adams / Sharon Miller vs Lorelei Hewitt / Dana Smith6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVicki Weber / Karla Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-02vs LKCA-Cassino/Westport 65Won 21
W#1 DoublesJane Rodewald / Kathy Buaron vs Sylvia Holley / Zergun Golan6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKarla Williams / Anne Clark vs Lorelei Hewitt / Barbara Bischoff6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Bost / Emily Jones vs Kathleen Cassino / Shirley Pirkl6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-26vs LKCA-Cassino/Westport 65Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Clark / Sharon Miller vs Sharyn Darden / Sylvia Holley6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusie Adams / Denise Bost vs Barbara Bischoff / Lorelei Hewitt6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEmily Jones / Karla Williams vs Dana Smith / Kathleen Cassino6-1, 6-0
2026-03-22vs LKCA-Cassino/Westport 65Won 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Buaron / Karla Williams vs Sylvia Holley / Sharyn Darden7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGina Martin / Margaret MacKie vs Kathleen Cassino / Lorelei Hewitt6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusie Adams / Denise Bost vs Shirley Pirkl / Barbara Bischoff6-1, 6-3
2026-03-19vs LKCA-Cassino/Westport 65Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusie Adams / Karla Williams vs Kathleen Cassino / Lorelei Hewitt6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Buaron / Denise Bost vs Sylvia Holley / Zergun Golan7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGina Martin / Margaret MacKie vs Shirley Pirkl / Barbara Bischoff6-1, 6-0
2026-03-05vs LKCA-Cassino/Westport 65Won 30
W#1 DoublesKarla Williams / Susie Adams vs Sharyn Darden / Lorelei Hewitt6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Buaron / Jane Rodewald vs Kathleen Cassino / Julie McConnell6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Clark / Sharon Miller vs Dana Smith / Shirley Pirkl6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Anne Clark
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Susie Adams
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.47
Margaret MacKie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Gina Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Kathy Buaron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Denise Bost
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Jane Rodewald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Karla Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Emily Jones
published 3.5
3.07
Vicki Weber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karla Williams + Susie Adams27466% games+7.1% vs expected
Denise Bost + Susie Adams14557% games+5.2% vs expected
Anne Clark + Karla Williams18562% games+4.6% vs expected
Kathy Buaron + Jane Rodewald4160% games+1.6% vs expected
Karla Williams + Kathy Buaron9362% games−6.9% vs expected
Margaret MacKie + Susie Adams4255% gamesnot enough data
Margaret MacKie + Kathy Buaron224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Buaron + Denise Bost303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Clark
82W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Susie Adams
157W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Margaret MacKie
127W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Gina Martin
19W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Kathy Buaron
183W–148L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Denise Bost
206W–139L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Jane Rodewald
111W–99L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Karla Williams
377W–168L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Emily Jones
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
Vicki Weber
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.