Teams

X18 6.0 TP Dean

2023 NEOTA Mixed 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed Spring

23 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-30vs X18 6.0 NC PaulinoLost 12
L#1 DoublesFrank Licari / Janel Ciolli vs William Arledge / Julianne Yang3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLouise Dapoz / Chris Manby vs Lora Kilkenny / JEROME HILL2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Ragner / Anne Laux vs Guy Cecchini / Jo Ann Cecchini6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-16vs X18 6.0 AS PhilipponLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Dean / Michael Terapane vs Scott Boyes / Susan Boyes3-6, 0-3
L#2 DoublesRon Novak / Tricia Graham vs Peter Philippon / Mary Lewis4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Consilio / Vince Cheverine vs Tom Mogus / Lee Mogus6-4, 6-1
2023-04-02vs X18 6.0 LT QuistWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristina McPhie / Michael Terapane vs NEIL MCHALE / Clare Stacey2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Laux / John Ragner vs Bill Ferry / Carolyn Kara5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Kaim / Chris Manby vs Alan Eng / Kimberly Savelieff6-3, 6-3
2023-03-26vs X18 6.0 PM FarrLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Terapane / Karen Kaim vs Bogdan Nicolae / Iuliana Nita6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRon Novak / Tanya Durbin vs Scott Nelson / Kristi Scherler4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Barker / Kim Dean vs William Farr / Christine Schwall6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-03-12vs X18 6.0 NC PaulinoWon 30
W#1 DoublesRon Novak / Tanya Durbin vs Noelle Buso / Rex Degler7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKim Dean / Michael Earnest vs Douglas Snyder / Jacqueline Snyder7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTiffanie Brown / Steve Barker vs Timothy Booher / Rachelle Booher6-4, 6-2
2023-03-05vs X18 6.0 AS PhilipponWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Earnest / Karen Kaim vs Andrew Stein / Jennifer Stein5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRon Novak / Tricia Graham vs Peter Philippon / Mary Lewis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Barker / Louise Dapoz vs Ron Krajcik / Anne Strauss6-1, 6-2
2023-02-26vs X18 6.0 LT QuistLost 12
W#1 DoublesSteve Barker / Tanya Durbin vs Carolyn Kara / Brandon Walch7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Ragner / Anne Laux vs NEIL MCHALE / Clare Stacey2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Manby / Lisa Consilio vs Kimberly Savelieff / Jeremy Clemens1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-12vs X18 6.0 PM FarrLost 03
L#1 DoublesRon Novak / Karen Kaim vs Bogdan Nicolae / Christine Schwall3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVince Cheverine / Susan Voth vs John Richardson / Jessica George6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChris Manby / Anne Laux vs William Farr / Iuliana Nita0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Mixed Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1X18 6.0 CC Dixon91201023225
2X18 6.0 MV3 Nine7321920231
3X18 6.0 LT Quist6217718166
4X18 6.0 PM Farr6216821190
5X18 6.0 MV2 Haught64201023227
6X18 6.0 PW Merugu46111939287
7X18 6.0 TP Dean35121228237
8X18 6.0 NC Paulino3591534246
9X18 6.0 MV1 Beebe37111945323
10X18 6.0 AS Philippon2661838259
11X18 6.0 CV Carroll1972348311

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Steve Barker
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.21
Susan Voth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Tanya Durbin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Lisa Consilio
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.87
Karen Kaim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Frank Licari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Gina Myers
published 3
Christina McPhie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Ron Novak
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.74
Kim Dean
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
John Ragner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Janel Ciolli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Anne Laux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Vince Cheverine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Mark Robeson
published
2.38
Tiffanie Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Manby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
LISA BATES
published
Louise Dapoz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Earnest
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Terapane
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tracy Campbell
published
Tricia Graham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Novak + Karen Kaim1637% games−6.6% vs expected
John Ragner + Louise Dapoz4546% gamesnot enough data
Janel Ciolli + Ron Novak4347% gamesnot enough data
Janel Ciolli + Vince Cheverine1533% gamesnot enough data
Vince Cheverine + Lisa Consilio4255% gamesnot enough data
Chris Manby + Anne Laux1527% gamesnot enough data
Ron Novak + Kim Dean2351% gamesnot enough data
Ron Novak + Christina McPhie3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Barker
77W–60L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
Susan Voth
84W–48L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Tanya Durbin
98W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Lisa Consilio
104W–110L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
Karen Kaim
93W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Frank Licari
86W–84L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Gina Myers
63W–39L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Christina McPhie
45W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Ron Novak
89W–144L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Kim Dean
88W–96L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
John Ragner
28W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Janel Ciolli
108W–133L career · 1 line in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Anne Laux
47W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
Vince Cheverine
62W–177L career · 4 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
Mark Robeson
12W–26L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
Tiffanie Brown
51W–74L career · 1 line in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.38
2.5
Chris Manby
5W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
LISA BATES
30W–40L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Louise Dapoz
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Earnest
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Terapane
45W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Campbell
15W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tricia Graham
33W–43L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.