Teams

FCCC

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.64 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-27vs MLFLost 01
L#1 DoublesHaley Hasler / Daniel Holmes vs Gordon Beck / Ginger Butcher0-6, 2-6
2021-06-13vs LVTALost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Holmes / Haley Hasler vs Heidi Abrahamson / Jeff Abrahamson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-06-06vs MLFLost 02
L#2 DoublesHaley Hasler / Austin Kelly vs Karen Kiser / Thomas Kissler5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Preiss / Chad Preiss vs Kristen Frisch / Gordon Beck7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2021-05-30vs HMTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Holmes / Josh Shelby vs Teresa Adsit / Dennis Tralmer6-1, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Holmes / Haley Hasler vs Eric Pavilonis / Cimarron Spitz7-6, 6-3
2021-05-23vs LVTALost 01
L#1 DoublesHaley Hasler / Daniel Holmes vs Heidi Abrahamson / Jeff Abrahamson1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Josh Shelby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Haley Hasler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Karen Preiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Daniel Holmes
published 3.5
3.34
Brian Dunbar
published 3.5
3.16
Chad Preiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Lisa Olsen
published
3.03
Austin Kelly
published 3.5
2.52
Nicole Holmes
published
Terese Shanley
published
Thomas Shanley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Preiss + Chad Preiss2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Josh Shelby
48W–51L career · 1 line in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Haley Hasler
122W–105L career · 5 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Karen Preiss
116W–45L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Daniel Holmes
57W–27L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Brian Dunbar
30W–23L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Chad Preiss
27W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Olsen
51W–48L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Austin Kelly
12W–25L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.03
Nicole Holmes
26W–38L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
Terese Shanley
31W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Shanley
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.