Teams

MLF

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.79 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-09vs LVTAWon 10
W#2 DoublesGordon Beck / Ginger Butcher vs Tanja Ratajczak / Brian Steckelberg6-0, 6-2
2021-06-27vs FCCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGordon Beck / Ginger Butcher vs Haley Hasler / Daniel Holmes6-0, 6-2
2021-06-18vs LVTALost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Kissler / Ginger Butcher vs Heidi Abrahamson / Jeff Abrahamson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Flake / Joe Ashbee vs Dawn Hagen / Jeff Fugate4-6, 6-7
2021-06-13vs HMTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesGinger Butcher / Shane Miller vs Vicki Dean / Kent Mueller6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Dirvonas / Joe Ashbee vs Cimarron Spitz / Eric Pavilonis6-3, 6-2
2021-06-06vs FCCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Frisch / Gordon Beck vs Karen Preiss / Chad Preiss5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-23vs HMTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesGinger Butcher / Joe Ashbee vs Cimarron Spitz / Steve Weber6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Dirvonas / Gordon Beck vs Karen Johnson / Dennis Tralmer6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Gordon Beck
published 4
3.97
Cathy Thomas
published 4
3.78
Ginger Butcher
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Joe Ashbee
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Shane Miller
published
3.25
Andrea Flake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kristen Frisch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Erin Dirvonas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karen Kiser
published
Kristen Fahrner
published
Thomas Kissler
published
Zach Flake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Dirvonas + Joe Ashbee6070% gamesnot enough data
Shane Miller + Karen Kiser4154% gamesnot enough data
Shane Miller + Andrea Flake404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gordon Beck
21W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Cathy Thomas
39W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Ginger Butcher
66W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Joe Ashbee
81W–50L career · 3 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
Shane Miller
49W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Andrea Flake
129W–81L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Kristen Frisch
74W–54L career · 1 line in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Erin Dirvonas
114W–83L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Karen Kiser
31W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristen Fahrner
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Kissler
9W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Zach Flake
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.