Teams

KMcWhorter-DUR

2026 Eno River Tri-Level 40 & Over · 40 & Over 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-20vs KNorris-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Oberle / Lorraine Hall vs Kelsey Norris / Kelly Johnson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kristin Cooley vs Laurie Straube / Karli Eller7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJudy Faubert / Lindsay Mize vs Nicole Dolan / Jennifer Magee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-13vs LCaldwell-SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim McWhorter / Kristin Cooley vs Erin McElligott / Katie Naftel6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Walsh / Anne Costello vs Amy Drew / Anne Stephens5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Faubert / Lindsay Mize vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-06vs KLeib-CCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Harvie / Kristin Cooley vs Tammy Sasser / Lynda Noga6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Costello / Amber Oberle vs Kathy Reedy / Tammy Chin6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJudy Faubert / Lindsay Mize vs Blake Ellis / Lisa Johnson6-0, 6-3
2026-06-29vs MLong.4.0T.40-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Motsinger / Elizabeth Harvie vs Brenda Li / Ann Skvarcius6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Rebecca Walsh vs Regina Davis / Celina Morice4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Betsy Euler vs Jamie Scaglione / Penny Kraft7-5, 6-1
2026-06-15vs KLaan-UNCWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Harvie / Sarah Motsinger vs Jenna Schreiber / Randy Smith6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kim McWhorter vs Kristi Laan / Hannah White6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Betsy Euler vs LAURIE KIEFFER / Patsy Park7-6, 6-2
2026-06-08vs KNorris-DURWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Motsinger / Kristin Cooley vs Cathy Joyce / Kelsey Norris6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKim McWhorter / Anne Costello vs Karli Eller / Wendy Lindberg7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJudy Faubert / Lindsay Mize vs Karen Sonders / Nicole Dolan6-4, 7-5
2026-06-01vs LCaldwell-SVCWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Harvie / Kristin Cooley vs Eve Hammett / Cynthia Moody4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Kim McWhorter vs Erin McElligott / Amy Drew6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelinda Duncker / Betsy Euler vs Ann Flodin / Laura Caldwell7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-18vs KLeib-CCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Harvie / Loralie Bible vs Lisa Montague / Lynda Noga6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Susan Easterling / Rebecca Walsh vs Tammy Chin / Anna Fadel7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudy Faubert / Betsy Euler vs Carolyn Krisko / Thuy Brooks6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Sarah Motsinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Lorraine Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Kristin Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.64
Elizabeth Harvie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Kim McWhorter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.56
Anne Costello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Amber Oberle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Mary Susan Easterling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Judy Faubert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Betsy Euler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Melinda Duncker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Lindsay Mize
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loralie Bible + Lindsay Mize10269% games+14.8% vs expected
Loralie Bible + Judy Faubert8072% games+9.4% vs expected
Betsy Euler + Melinda Duncker16855% games+7.1% vs expected
Kristin Cooley + Loralie Bible12261% games+5.3% vs expected
Kim McWhorter + Melinda Duncker15759% games+4.8% vs expected
Kim McWhorter + Loralie Bible9265% games+4.8% vs expected
Lindsay Mize + Judy Faubert22364% games+2.3% vs expected
Betsy Euler + Kim McWhorter4253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Motsinger
38W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Lorraine Hall
50W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.74
Kristin Cooley
34W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
Elizabeth Harvie
21W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Anne Costello
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Amber Oberle
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Mary Susan Easterling
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3
Judy Faubert
86W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
3
Betsy Euler
139W–108L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Melinda Duncker
80W–61L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Lindsay Mize
111W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.