Teams

Fisher Island

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Day · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesBarbara Goldin / Barbara J Spencer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-18vs Miami/TeamRiviera/18&over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Goldin / Brie Sasson vs Beatrice Zapata / Adriana Monsalve6-7, 3-6
2024-03-04vs Miami/TeamRiviera/18&over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesClaudia Hernandez-Pons / Barbara Goldin vs Jessica Patino / Ashley Galvin1-6, 3-6
2024-01-22vs Miami/TeamRiviera/18&over3.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Goldin / Erika Jaeger vs Valerie Berrin / Cat Busot3-6, 3-6
2024-01-15vs Miami/TeamRiviera/18&over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Goldin / Rima Otrakji vs Nathalia Blanco / Mariana Rodriguez3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Brie Sasson
published 3.5
3.26
Elizabeth Stephens
published
3.20
Barbara Goldin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Ana Bustamante
published 3
3.10
Masha Yudina
published
3.09
3.08
Jill Granader
published
3.06
Erika Jaeger
published
3.05
Barbara J Spencer
published 3.5
3.00
Tammie Roodner
published
2.94
Judith Pucknat
published
MARA LANDIS
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Goldin + Tammie Roodner033 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Stephens + Erika Jaeger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brie Sasson
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Elizabeth Stephens
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Goldin
13W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
3
Ana Bustamante
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.12
Masha Yudina
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.10
3.5
Claudia Hernandez-Pons
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jill Granader
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Erika Jaeger
22W–60L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Barbara J Spencer
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Tammie Roodner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Judith Pucknat
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
MARA LANDIS
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.