Teams

Miami/TeamRiviera/18&over3.5W

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Day · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-25vs Fisher IslandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLorena Guadiana / Yuliet Pellegrini vs Tammie Roodner / Allison Lorber6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs Claudia Hernandez-Pons6-7, 6-7
2024-03-18vs Fisher IslandWon 30
W#2 DoublesJessica Patino / Nathalia Blanco vs Erika Jaeger / Claudia Hernandez-Pons6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMaria Riccobono vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeatrice Zapata / Adriana Monsalve vs Barbara Goldin / Brie Sasson7-6, 6-3
2024-03-11vs Fisher IslandWon 20
W#1 DoublesYuliet Pellegrini / Emily Burrows vs Allison Lorber / Jill Granader6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMaria Riccobono vs Masha Yudina6-1, 6-1
2024-03-04Won 20
W#1 SinglesBeatrice Zapata vs Charlotte Pasko6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJessica Patino / Ashley Galvin vs Claudia Hernandez-Pons / Barbara Goldin6-1, 6-3
2024-02-06vs Fisher IslandWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Tolman / Jessica Patino vs Jill Granader / Allison Lorber2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs Claudia Hernandez-Pons6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNathalia Blanco / Ashley Galvin vs Judith Pucknat / Charlotte Pasko6-0, 6-3
2024-01-22vs Fisher IslandLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Morrow / Nathalia Blanco vs Tammie Roodner / Allison Lorber6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAdriana Monsalve vs Ana Bustamante5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Tolman / Jessica Patino vs MARA LANDIS / Judith Pucknat6-2, 6-1
2024-01-15vs Fisher IslandWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessica Patino / Amy Tolman vs Allison Lorber / Tammie Roodner2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs Masha Yudina6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNathalia Blanco / Mariana Rodriguez vs Barbara Goldin / Rima Otrakji6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Emily Burrows
published
3.80
Amy Morrow
published 4
Deanna Etzold
published 4
3.69
Jessica Patino
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
ALEJANDRA GIL
published 3.5
3.59
Beatrice Zapata
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Nathalia Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 81%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.50
Ashley Galvin
published 3.5
3.48
Mildred Rembisz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.41
Valerie Berrin
published
3.40
Lorena Guadiana
published
3.38
Maria Riccobono
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Yuliet Pellegrini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Adriana Monsalve
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
XIMENA OTERO
published
3.24
Amy Tolman
usually #1 Doubles 94%, also #3 Doubles 6% · published 3.5
3.23
Cat Busot
published 3.5
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Patino + Amy Tolman351258% games+15.3% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Valerie Berrin9165% games+7.6% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Amy Tolman28862% games+5.3% vs expected
Yuliet Pellegrini + ALEJANDRA GIL3446% games+5.2% vs expected
Emily Burrows + Amy Morrow9264% games+4.1% vs expected
Beatrice Zapata + ALEJANDRA GIL5258% games−1.8% vs expected
Ashley Galvin + Jessica Patino3352% games−6.2% vs expected
Nathalia Blanco + Adriana Monsalve5058% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Burrows
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Amy Morrow
31W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Deanna Etzold
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jessica Patino
156W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
ALEJANDRA GIL
60W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Beatrice Zapata
87W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Nathalia Blanco
323W–115L career · 16 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Ashley Galvin
33W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Mildred Rembisz
118W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Valerie Berrin
33W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
Lorena Guadiana
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.40
3.5
Maria Riccobono
151W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Yuliet Pellegrini
206W–125L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Adriana Monsalve
181W–83L career · 16 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
XIMENA OTERO
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Tolman
115W–45L career · 17 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Cat Busot
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.