Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Sanzeri

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over - CV · CV Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 SinglesJeff Mosier vs Christopher Prescott6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJeff Mosier / Soterios ANAGNOSTOU vs Jason Hall / Bryan Johnson4-6, 6-7
2024-01-30vs CV-Indian Wells TG/GilesLost 01
L#1 DoublesSoterios ANAGNOSTOU / Jeff Mosier vs Joe Voydat / RAFAEL PRECIADO1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Barr / Jeff Mosier vs Andrew Light / Kurtis Magee2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Yul Bongcaras
published
3.71
C Collins
published 4
3.71
William Carrick
published
3.66
Michael Estanol
published
3.60
Craig Ellis
published 4
3.60
Joseph Barr
published
3.58
Soterios ANAGNOSTOU
published
3.49
Jeff Mosier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Scott Hendrickson
published
3.43
Ralph Sanzeri
published
Matthew Merced
published
Randy Diamond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Carrick + Craig Ellis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yul Bongcaras
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
C Collins
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
William Carrick
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Michael Estanol
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Craig Ellis
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Joseph Barr
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Soterios ANAGNOSTOU
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jeff Mosier
62W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Scott Hendrickson
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Ralph Sanzeri
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.43
Matthew Merced
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Randy Diamond
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.