OC LLW Monarch Beach LNRC - Elyzabeth - Sun1030

2025 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 3.73 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule1 played

2025-05-03vs OC Yorba Linda - Benji - Sat3Won 2–0

W#2 DoublesAida Morad / Peter Nguyen vs Annie Sahyoun / Philip Sahyoun6-1, 6-2

W#3 DoublesDayna Marinos / Quang Luu vs Melissa McCullough / Vikram Anerao6-4, 6-2

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 7.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22

Valentina Stepanova

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

3.92

Elyzabeth Pham

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.90

Miki Sugiura

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.74

Aida Morad

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.61

Ai Freger

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.60

Stacie Scifres

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.59

Cassie Hadfield

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.49

Mike Scifres

published —

3.46

Dayna Marinos

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.46

Kelly Tremmel

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

3.43

Elizabeth Jeffries

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.34

Quang Luu

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

3.33

Holly Wyler

published 3.5

—

Jack Yen

published 3.5

—

KAZI ISLAM

published —

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5

Valentina Stepanova

172W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025

5%94%2%

4.22

Elyzabeth Pham

152W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025

<1%73%27%

3.92

Miki Sugiura

73W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025

<1%77%23%

3.90

Aida Morad

18W–8L career · 1 line in 2025

3%94%2%

3.74

3.5

Ai Freger

61W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025

<1%21%79%

3.61

3.5

Stacie Scifres

52W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025

<1%23%77%

3.60

3.5

Cassie Hadfield

62W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025

<1%25%75%

3.59

—

Mike Scifres

3W–2L career · no lines in 2025

54%46%<1%

3.49

3.5

Dayna Marinos

22W–8L career · 1 line in 2025

<1%61%39%

3.46

—

Kelly Tremmel

14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025

<1%64%36%

3.46

3.5

Elizabeth Jeffries

52W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025

<1%70%30%

3.43

—

Quang Luu

12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025

<1%89%10%

3.34

3.5

Holly Wyler

9W–21L career · no lines in 2025

1%90%10%

3.33

3.5

Jack Yen

3W–1L career · no lines in 2025

not enough data

—

KAZI ISLAM

4W–0L career · no lines in 2025

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.