Teams

MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesChristine Start / Joma Ann Raniel vs Frances Caroline Gardhouse / Mai Pham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aina Lu
published 4.5
3.92
Joma Ann Raniel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Rose Madriaga
published
3.83
Michele Rumfola
published
3.70
Karissa Watanabe
published
3.70
Julie Dean
published
3.66
Molly McMahon
published
3.60
Bonnie Chamchawee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.59
Lenka Quinanola
published
3.56
Rachel Banse
published
3.56
Pegah Seddighian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Abbie Serrano
published 3.5
3.45
Kalina Stephani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Christine Breen
published 4
3.31
Denise Galocy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Amber Diaz-Garcia
published 3.5
3.19
Kristie Solomon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Dana Padilla
published 3.5
Julie Watanabe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Madriaga + Joma Ann Raniel9073% games+16.8% vs expected
Kristie Solomon + Denise Galocy9161% games+10.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aina Lu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joma Ann Raniel
30W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Rose Madriaga
25W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Michele Rumfola
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Karissa Watanabe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Julie Dean
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Molly McMahon
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Bonnie Chamchawee
82W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.60
Lenka Quinanola
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Rachel Banse
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Pegah Seddighian
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Abbie Serrano
36W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.50
Kalina Stephani
6W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
4
Christine Breen
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.39
3.5
Denise Galocy
21W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Amber Diaz-Garcia
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Kristie Solomon
29W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dana Padilla
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Julie Watanabe
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.