Teams

El.Nixon40S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-14vs He.McCann40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Rachel McLean6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Lukz vs Amy Cuni5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Helen Michaels2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-10vs Sa.Overholser40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Dana Aderhold2-6, 1-6
2024-10-07vs As.Walker40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesErin Hemminger vs Britt Tolliver2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-29vs As.Walker40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesErin Hemminger vs Jennifer Guy1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Lukz vs Myra Peterson4-6, 3-6
2024-09-23vs He.McCann40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Heidi McCann3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Amy Cuni4-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesErin Hemminger vs Jill Wolborsky6-0, 6-1
2024-09-09vs Sa.Overholser40SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Jerri Lemanski0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Inma Navarro Galisteo6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-02vs He.McCann40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Amy Cuni5-7, 2-6
2024-08-26vs As.Walker40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Kari Barsness0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Lukz vs Ashley Walker1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Elizabeth Marriott
published
2.92
Michelle Gessner
published
2.85
Brianna Shait
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.82
Michele Lagerstedt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.79
Erin Hemminger
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.75
Amanda Shelton
published 3
2.70
Sarah Lukz
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.43
Elisabeth Nixon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Hemminger + Sarah Lukz10458% games−2.6% vs expected
Sarah Lukz + Brianna Shait4163% gamesnot enough data
Michele Lagerstedt + Brianna Shait033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Marriott
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Michelle Gessner
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Brianna Shait
86W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Michele Lagerstedt
58W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Erin Hemminger
96W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Amanda Shelton
9W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Sarah Lukz
75W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Elisabeth Nixon
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.