Teams

As.Walker40S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-07vs El.Nixon40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElena Ryzhikova vs Michelle Gessner2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Amanda Shelton6-3, 6-3
2024-09-30vs He.McCann40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesElena Ryzhikova vs Alise Fredrickson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Kimberly Lamb6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJennifer Guy vs Jill Wolborsky6-0, 6-3
2024-09-29vs El.Nixon40SWon 20
W#2 SinglesJennifer Guy vs Erin Hemminger6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMyra Peterson vs Sarah Lukz6-4, 6-3
2024-09-23vs Sa.Overholser40SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJennifer Guy vs Julie Bullock6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Inma Navarro Galisteo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-09-09vs He.McCann40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesKari Barsness vs Lisa Merritt6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMyra Peterson vs Jill Wolborsky6-2, 6-4
2024-09-02vs Sa.Overholser40SWon 10
W#3 SinglesStephanie Suski vs Inma Navarro Galisteo6-0, 7-5
2024-08-26vs El.Nixon40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKari Barsness vs Brianna Shait6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStephanie Suski vs Michelle Gessner6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-19vs He.McCann40SWon 10
W#2 SinglesStephanie Suski vs Amy Cuni6-1, 7-5
2024-08-12vs Sa.Overholser40SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesElena Ryzhikova vs Dana Aderhold2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Julie Bullock6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Lorraine Hall
published
3.02
Beth Pegram
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.00
Jennifer Guy
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.00
Elena Ryzhikova
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.99
Stephanie Suski
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.98
Kari Barsness
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.92
Britt Tolliver
published 3
2.83
Myra Peterson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Myra Peterson + Kari Barsness2450% gamesnot enough data
Elena Ryzhikova + Beth Pegram4160% gamesnot enough data
Myra Peterson + Elena Ryzhikova213 matchesnot enough data
Kari Barsness + Stephanie Suski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorraine Hall
53W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.72
3
Beth Pegram
77W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Jennifer Guy
72W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Elena Ryzhikova
75W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Stephanie Suski
125W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Kari Barsness
125W–125L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Britt Tolliver
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Myra Peterson
170W–141L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.