Teams

CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/P Terhar

2025 SCTA Mixed Doubles 55 & Over - CV · CV Mixed Doubles 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-24vs CV-Toscana CC/BratlienLost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Delaney / Scott Brown vs Rebecca Bratlien / Peter Taylor3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRoger Davis / Jill Delaney vs Luke Breton / Roberta Dierks3-6, 2-6
2025-02-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Brad Olmschenk vs Tom Sloan / Becky Jones6-3, 6-1
2025-02-08vs CV-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L GagnonLost 02
L#1 DoublesPATTY TERHAR / George Jackson vs Susan D Morin / Frank Gagnon5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMona Knudslien / Glen Stock vs Mary Fox / Tom Sass7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-18vs CV-Palm Desert TC/S SkorupaWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Cesar Vallejo vs Clark Richards / Ingrid Sarapuu6-2, 6-4
2025-01-12vs CV-Deep Canyon/ZuckerLost 01
L#2 DoublesRoger Davis / Jill Delaney vs Lea Poirier / Arthur Poirier4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Mona Knudslien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
PATTY TERHAR
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Marti Jablon
published
3.37
Jill Delaney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Bob Lipnosky
published 3.5
3.19
Patrice Jackson
published
3.17
Barry Cooper
published 3.5
3.07
Terri Johnson
published
3.05
Cesar Vallejo
published 3.5
2.75
BILL TERHAR
published 3
Glen Stock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roger Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PATTY TERHAR + BILL TERHAR224 matchesnot enough data
Glen Stock + Mona Knudslien033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mona Knudslien
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
PATTY TERHAR
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Marti Jablon
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Jill Delaney
102W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Bob Lipnosky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrice Jackson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Barry Cooper
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Terri Johnson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cesar Vallejo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
BILL TERHAR
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Glen Stock
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Roger Davis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.