Teams

CV-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/L Gagnon

2025 SCTA Mixed Doubles 55 & Over - CV · CV Mixed Doubles 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDuane Chernow / Carolyn Wright vs Angela Peixotto-Monk / Andrew Sacks4-6, 1-6
2025-02-22vs CV-The Springs/Cronyn & C PinoLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Duane Chernow vs Ward Mallabone / Carol Mallabone6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-15vs CV-Four Seasons Beaumont/StokesWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrank Gagnon / Lesley Gagnon vs Charles Beckman / Gayle Vanderlinden6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMark Susskind / Laura Susskind vs Tracy Mahan / Larry Martin2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTerry Wilkins / Carrie Morton vs Joe Leogrande / Catherine Leogrande6-0, 6-4
2025-02-08vs CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/P TerharWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan D Morin / Frank Gagnon vs PATTY TERHAR / George Jackson7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Fox / Tom Sass vs Mona Knudslien / Glen Stock5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Kevin Ondatje vs Kyle Ferguson / Janette Lyons2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Kevin Ondatje vs Daniel Karnowsky / Susan Devereaux6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Mixed Doubles 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Frank Gagnon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Susan D Morin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Lesley Gagnon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Carolyn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Morton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Duane Chernow
published
Laura Susskind
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Susskind
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Jasmine
published
Terry Wilkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Sass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Frank Gagnon
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Susan D Morin
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Lesley Gagnon
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
4
Carrie Morton
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.16
Duane Chernow
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Susskind
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Susskind
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Wilkins
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tom Sass
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.