Teams

WC GREEN

2021 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-06-15vs SSH NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesElaine Golden Webster / Juli Simmermon vs Sudy Opsahl / Robin Allis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesArijana Barun / Emily Lewis vs Connie Darrow / Susan Panning6-2, 6-0
2021-05-18vs PTC YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesBonnie Baker / Emily Lewis vs Christine Trigg / Katy Cafazza6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJuli Simmermon / Elaine Golden Webster vs Carlynn Schlissberg / Emily Ferguson6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJESSICA MORTON / Arijana Barun vs Caren Swan / Elizabeth Barnes6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Emily Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Elaine Golden Webster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Juli Simmermon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bonnie Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
JESSICA MORTON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Arijana Barun
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jenny Yotter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juli Simmermon + Emily Lewis19861% games+7.6% vs expected
JESSICA MORTON + Juli Simmermon5069% games+3.3% vs expected
Bonnie Baker + Arijana Barun3246% games−0.4% vs expected
Bonnie Baker + Juli Simmermon1446% gamesnot enough data
Juli Simmermon + Arijana Barun213 matchesnot enough data
Juli Simmermon + Elaine Golden Webster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Lewis
66W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Elaine Golden Webster
99W–34L career · 2 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Juli Simmermon
68W–73L career · 2 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Bonnie Baker
47W–40L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3
JESSICA MORTON
42W–36L career · type A · 1 line in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
Arijana Barun
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jenny Yotter
24W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.