Teams

PTC YELLOW

2021 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-22vs SSH NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Trigg / Su Mei Chen vs Connie Darrow / Sudy Opsahl1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarlynn Schlissberg / Caren Swan vs Susan Panning / Karen Smith4-6, 1-6
2021-06-15vs VC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Trigg / Katy Cafazza vs Kathleen Nisbet / Claire Lindsay6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSu Mei Chen / Caren Swan vs Hallie White / Wendy Serafin7-6, 6-1
2021-06-08vs SKY REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaren Swan / Christine Trigg vs Missy Stolberg / Rebecca Thomas6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaty Cafazza / Su Mei Chen vs Jessica Dewees / Jessie Johnson2-6, 2-6
2021-06-01vs HRCA GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Trigg / Carlynn Schlissberg vs Natalie Lucero / Cynthia Clifford2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaty Cafazza / Caren Swan vs Jaclyn Dunford / Tosha MacK6-0, 6-3
2021-05-31vs GCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCaren Swan / Christine Trigg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Shader / Katy Cafazza vs Shannon Elmore Bell / Margo Livadariu0-6, 4-6
2021-05-18vs WC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Trigg / Katy Cafazza vs Bonnie Baker / Emily Lewis1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarlynn Schlissberg / Emily Ferguson vs Juli Simmermon / Elaine Golden Webster0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaren Swan / Elizabeth Barnes vs JESSICA MORTON / Arijana Barun4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Su Mei Chen
published
2.95
Caren Swan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.34
Katy Cafazza
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.32
Emily Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Christine Trigg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.89
Katie Shader
published
Carlynn Schlissberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Trigg + Su Mei Chen6087% games+21.5% vs expected
Su Mei Chen + Caren Swan14660% games+10.8% vs expected
Christine Trigg + Caren Swan7265% games+5.8% vs expected
Katie Shader + Emily Ferguson2343% games+0.6% vs expected
Christine Trigg + Katy Cafazza8949% games−1.7% vs expected
Katy Cafazza + Emily Ferguson1534% games−5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Su Mei Chen
85W–41L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Caren Swan
146W–83L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
2.95
2.5
Katy Cafazza
89W–78L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Emily Ferguson
19W–37L career · 1 line in 2021
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Christine Trigg
76W–77L career · 6 lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.21
Katie Shader
10W–19L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Carlynn Schlissberg
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.