Teams

VC RED

2021 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-22vs HRCA GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Needler-Turner / Kathleen Nisbet vs Cynthia Clifford / Natalie Lucero3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTraci Samaras / Kate Patton vs Tosha MacK / Mali Samur McFarland6-1, 6-2
2021-06-15vs PTC YELLOWWon 10
W#3 DoublesKate Patton / Megan Kane vs Katie Shader / Emily Ferguson6-3, 6-4
2021-06-08vs WC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Lindsay / Traci Samaras vs Emily Lewis / Juli Simmermon2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Nisbet / Lindsay Needler-Turner vs Bonnie Baker / Arijana Barun6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKate Patton / Cindy Bolin vs JESSICA MORTON / Jenny Yotter1-6, 1-6
2021-06-01vs GCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsay Needler-Turner / Claire Lindsay vs Shannon Elmore Bell / Jennifer Maloney6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKate Patton / Tamara Hertz vs Emily Eikelberner / Stephanie Peacock7-5, 6-2
2021-05-25vs SSH NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesTamara Hertz / Lindsay Needler-Turner vs Connie Darrow / Lavonne Kaiser7-6, 6-3
2021-05-13vs SKY REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaire Lindsay / Lindsay Needler-Turner vs Missy Stolberg / Kristi Desfosses6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathleen Nisbet / Kate Patton vs Rebecca Thomas / Shelley Jewell3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Serafin / Traci Samaras vs Sara Colvin / Jessie Johnson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lindsay Needler-Turner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.62
Wendy Serafin
published
2.43
Kate Patton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.41
Traci Samaras
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
Kathleen Nisbet
published
Cindy Bolin
published
Claire Lindsay
published
Tamara Hertz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Samaras + Kate Patton101152% games−3.9% vs expected
Kathleen Nisbet + Claire Lindsay2343% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Nisbet + Traci Samaras213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lindsay Needler-Turner
104W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Wendy Serafin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Kate Patton
72W–120L career · 5 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
2.43
2.5
Traci Samaras
69W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%76%24%
2.41
Kathleen Nisbet
29W–37L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Cindy Bolin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Claire Lindsay
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tamara Hertz
4W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.