Teams

KY/PUR/PRICE

2024 USTA COMBO 18 & OVER PURCHASE · 6.5 Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-30vs KY/PUR/WILLISWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Clapp / Heidi van Ameringen vs Lajeanna Thornton / Ashley Willis6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMallory Harris / Jennifer Price vs Catherine Lanier / Allison Morris6-0, 6-1
2024-09-26vs KY/PUR/WILLISWon 20
W#1 DoublesChelsea Hartmann / KRISTA Hatchett vs Lee Ann Taylor / Sadie Humphreys6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Price / Anna Anderson vs Tawnya Hunter / Allison Morris6-4, 6-4
2024-09-23vs KY/PUR/WILLISWon 20
W#1 DoublesChelsea Hartmann / Heidi van Ameringen vs Ashley Willis / Kellie Steele6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKara Geiger / Mallory Harris vs Tawnya Hunter / Allison Morris7-5, 6-4
2024-09-17vs KY/PUR/WILLISWon 20
W#1 DoublesKara Geiger / KRISTA Hatchett vs Ashley Willis / Kellie Steele6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChelsea Hartmann / Anna Anderson vs Lajeanna Thornton / Tawnya Hunter6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
KRISTA Hatchett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Heidi van Ameringen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Kara Geiger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Kelly Clapp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Mallory Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Chelsea Hartmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Anna Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi van Ameringen + KRISTA Hatchett14169% games+19.0% vs expected
Heidi van Ameringen + Kara Geiger2350% gamesnot enough data
Heidi van Ameringen + Anna Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
KRISTA Hatchett + Anna Anderson303 matchesnot enough data
Kara Geiger + Mallory Harris303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KRISTA Hatchett
57W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Heidi van Ameringen
41W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
Kara Geiger
46W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
Kelly Clapp
42W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Mallory Harris
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Chelsea Hartmann
23W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Anna Anderson
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.