Teams

KY/PUR/WILLIS

2024 USTA COMBO 18 & OVER PURCHASE · 6.5 Adult Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-30vs KY/PUR/PRICELost 02
L#1 DoublesLajeanna Thornton / Ashley Willis vs Kelly Clapp / Heidi van Ameringen0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Lanier / Allison Morris vs Mallory Harris / Jennifer Price0-6, 1-6
2024-09-26vs KY/PUR/PRICELost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Ann Taylor / Sadie Humphreys vs Chelsea Hartmann / KRISTA Hatchett2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTawnya Hunter / Allison Morris vs Jennifer Price / Anna Anderson4-6, 4-6
2024-09-23vs KY/PUR/PRICELost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Willis / Kellie Steele vs Chelsea Hartmann / Heidi van Ameringen1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTawnya Hunter / Allison Morris vs Kara Geiger / Mallory Harris5-7, 4-6
2024-09-17vs KY/PUR/PRICELost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Willis / Kellie Steele vs Kara Geiger / KRISTA Hatchett1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLajeanna Thornton / Tawnya Hunter vs Chelsea Hartmann / Anna Anderson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 6.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/PUR/WILLIS0401224145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Donna Almand
published 3.5
3.10
Sadie Humphreys
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Karen Kineman
published
2.89
Tawnya Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Lanier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kellie Steele
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lajeanna Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lee Ann Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sadie Humphreys + Karen Kineman2349% games+3.1% vs expected
Donna Almand + Karen Kineman7845% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Almand
35W–38L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
Sadie Humphreys
15W–42L career · 1 line in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.10
Karen Kineman
25W–52L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Tawnya Hunter
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Catherine Lanier
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kellie Steele
24W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Lajeanna Thornton
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lee Ann Taylor
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.