Teams

NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Rifkin

NIN FW Adult 18 & Over · NIN FW 18 & Over 3.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesMark Rifkin / Douglas Rounds vs Eric Tippmann / Elmer Toliver6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesIgor Nikitin / Ryan Treesh vs Charles Ji / Brandon Fehn2-6, 0-2
2026-07-16Won 21
W#1 DoublesBrandon Borders / Stephen Christen vs Jeff Elliott / Rex Peters6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesIgor Nikitin vs GEORGE JOHN0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMark Rifkin / Ryan Treesh vs Adam Cox / Mithun Shenoi6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesStephen Christen / Jonah Werst vs Dinesh Agnihotri / John Ducker6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesIgor Nikitin vs Mark Tipmongkol3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Hackett / Mark Rifkin vs MIKE MORGAN / Brent Davis6-2, 7-6
2026-07-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesJonah Werst / Stephen Christen vs Rex Peters / Brad Geisleman6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMark Rifkin vs Andrew Kajioka7-5, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMark Rifkin / Jonah Werst vs Elmer Toliver / John Ducker3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Christen / Igor Nikitin vs Charles Ji / Brandon Fehn1-6, 3-6
2026-06-16Split 11
L#1 DoublesMark Rifkin / Douglas Rounds vs Jeff Elliott / Brad Geisleman2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrandon Borders / Stephen Christen vs John Lew / Sreenivasa Nattam6-1, 6-0
2026-06-04Split 11
L#2 DoublesBrandon Borders / Mark Rifkin vs Mark Tipmongkol / John Ducker6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesStephen Christen vs Brent Davis6-1, 6-1
2026-05-28vs NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW SuttonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMark Rifkin / Douglas Rounds vs Greg Salway / Mithun Shenoi6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesStephen Christen vs Dennis Pitsilides1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NIN FW 18 & Over 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Sutton53202045357
2NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel44221841329
3NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Rifkin35182248362

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Mark Rifkin
usually #1 Doubles 21%, also #2 Singles 21% · published
2.90
Stephen Christen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.76
Igor Nikitin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Rifkin
41W–36L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
Stephen Christen
72W–97L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Igor Nikitin
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.