Teams

FV:Break Point:Franklin/Rutigliano

2026 NCT Adult 65 & Over Women · 7.0 65 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesCindy Franklin / Lynn Rappaport vs Marie Roncalli / Pam Brenner-Newton1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTracy Tietje / Trudy Pearce vs Carol MacColl / Susan Anderson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Rutigliano / Gail Granger vs Valerie Stauber / Patricia Sullivan3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Giannoni / Lynn Rappaport vs Elizabeth Varner / Sue Trompke5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesGail Granger / Priscilla Z Behidj vs Patricia Sullivan / Valerie Stauber3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Giannoni / Tracy Tietje vs Sue Trompke / Susan Anderson5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Rutigliano / Lynn Rappaport vs Deborah Hardy / Johanne Presser4-6, 3-6
2026-07-28vs RH:Sizzling Seniors:Dunn/SchaarLost 03
L#1 DoublesGail Granger / Priscilla Z Behidj vs Connie Hurtt / Roisin MacKey4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Tietje / Trudy Pearce vs Jeanette Boyd-Phillips / Patria Disla3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Franklin / Lynn Rappaport vs Roberta Pratt / Karen Eller3-6, 1-6
2026-07-12vs RH:Sizzling Seniors:Dunn/SchaarLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Tietje / Trudy Pearce vs Lucille Dunn / Vicki Schaar5-7, 5-4
L#2 DoublesLynn Rappaport / Mary Fuller vs Mary Daley / Mary Ellen Mooney5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Franklin / Priscilla Z Behidj vs Donna Bonin / Karen Burgess6-4, 6-4
2026-06-16vs RH:Sizzling Seniors:Dunn/SchaarLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Franklin / Gail Granger vs Mary Daley / Peggy Ryan4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Priscilla Z Behidj
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Lynn Rappaport
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Christine Giannoni
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Judith Sutton
published
2.94
Cindy Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Karen Rutigliano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gail Granger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Tietje
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Trudy Pearce
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Franklin + Priscilla Z Behidj7157% games−1.5% vs expected
Cindy Franklin + Karen Rutigliano8653% games−1.6% vs expected
Christine Giannoni + Karen Rutigliano3646% games−3.9% vs expected
Trudy Pearce + Tracy Tietje2642% games−5.5% vs expected
Cindy Franklin + Tracy Tietje3355% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Franklin + Christine Giannoni123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Franklin + Gail Granger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Priscilla Z Behidj
35W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Lynn Rappaport
16W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Christine Giannoni
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Judith Sutton
14W–54L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Cindy Franklin
114W–113L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Karen Rutigliano
112W–102L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Gail Granger
20W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Fuller
19W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tracy Tietje
86W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trudy Pearce
56W–76L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.