Teams

LBible-UNC

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-18vs LKulp-SVCWon 20
W#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Ann Flodin6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRagini Singh vs Laura Gallaher6-0, 6-0
2025-11-18vs MMacdonald-HSWon 30
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Shira Katsir6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Altagracia Evert6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Linda Naden6-1, 6-0
2025-11-13vs PDavis-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNsimba Mahungu vs Caroline Sloan6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLindsay Mize vs Adrianne Charleston4-6, 6-7
2025-11-04vs TCrowley-CHTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesRagini Singh vs Lisa Baxter6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Tracy Crowley3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLindsay Mize vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-21vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesNsimba Mahungu vs Kim McWhorter6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Andrew Moon2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Kylie Herst6-1, 6-1
2025-10-16vs MLong-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesNsimba Mahungu vs Aine Lynch6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJulia Haslett vs Susan Brogden5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRagini Singh vs Kelsey Mortimore6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Ragini Singh
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Nsimba Mahungu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.00
Lindsay Mize
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.92
Julia Haslett
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
2.68
Lucy McMillan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loralie Bible + Lindsay Mize10269% games+14.6% vs expected
Loralie Bible + Lucy McMillan5061% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Mize + Nsimba Mahungu224 matchesnot enough data
Nsimba Mahungu + Ragini Singh314 matchesnot enough data
Ragini Singh + Julia Haslett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loralie Bible
186W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Ragini Singh
95W–47L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.41
3
Nsimba Mahungu
67W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
3
Lindsay Mize
111W–61L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Julia Haslett
48W–55L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lucy McMillan
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.