Teams

LKulp-SVC

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-11-22vs SFranks-DURWon 10
W#3 SinglesAshlyn Zebrowski vs Chelsea Donahue6-1, 6-4
2025-11-18vs LBible-UNCLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Loralie Bible4-6, 4-6
2025-11-17vs KMasood-DURWon 10
W#1 SinglesAshlyn Zebrowski vs Elyssa Millard6-0, 6-0
2025-11-14vs MLong2-DURWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Emani Eaglin6-1, 6-1
2025-11-12vs NDolan-HRLost 01
L#2 SinglesAshlyn Zebrowski vs Drew Scruggs4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-11-04vs MMacdonald-HSWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Shira Katsir6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAshlyn Zebrowski vs Tynita Edwards6-0, 6-1
2025-10-21vs PDavis-DURWon 10
W#2 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Jonda Young6-0, 6-0
2025-10-20vs GLoFrese-DURWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Hannah Harvey3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-14vs MFulton-UNCWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshlyn Zebrowski vs Erin Berliner6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Lindsey Gouker6-0, 6-2
2025-10-13vs LBible-DURLost 01
L#2 SinglesAshlyn Zebrowski vs Julia Haslett6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Lauren Kulp
published 3.5
3.21
Ashlyn Zebrowski
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.19
Erin McElligott
published
3.15
Ann Flodin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.94
Michele Peters
published
2.92
Laura Gallaher
published
2.79
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Kulp + Ashlyn Zebrowski3455% gamesnot enough data
Michele Peters + Ashlyn Zebrowski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Kulp
86W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3
Ashlyn Zebrowski
81W–57L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Erin McElligott
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Ann Flodin
65W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.15
Michele Peters
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Laura Gallaher
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Elischa Dessalines
39W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.