Teams

KY/LEX/Coy/Johnson

2023 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Sarah Stykes
published
3.40
Emily Diehl
published
3.39
Janine Coy
published
3.38
Kristen Tewell
published
3.32
Rose Knight
published
3.25
3.15
Yvonne Conner
published
3.12
Stephanie Queen
published
3.10
Tanya Johnson
published
3.05
Karen Sandberg
published
2.88
Natalie Avant
published
Emma Newland
published
Laura Kirkley
published
Michelle Kline
published
Sara Grau
published
Tara Swan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janine Coy + Kristen Tewell8260% games+10.6% vs expected
Rose Knight + Stephanie Queen2451% games+2.6% vs expected
Tanya Johnson + Natalie Avant0636% games−13.0% vs expected
Emily Diehl + Janine Coy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Stykes
30W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
Kristen Tewell
20W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Rose Knight
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amy Worthington Johnson
22W–28L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Yvonne Conner
15W–36L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Stephanie Queen
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Tanya Johnson
6W–34L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
Karen Sandberg
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Natalie Avant
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Emma Newland
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Kirkley
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Kline
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Grau
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tara Swan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.