Teams

Ek Murtagh

2026 NE Adult 18&Over Tri-Level · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-24vs Green OrrLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Boik / Santiago Murtagh vs Kreg Green / Jackson Schwanebeck6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Fox / Bryce Hansen vs Jake Green / Angel Naranjo6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Givens / John Klotz vs Chase Nevels / Tucker Merz2-6, 1-6
2026-08-17vs MandigoWon 21
L#1 DoublesSantiago Murtagh / David Fox vs Jackson Figard / Patrick Sullivan3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Ek / Rodney Ware vs Kevin Mandigo / Myles Jasnowski6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlan Givens / Peter Tran vs Andrew Brandt / Tyler Bordeaux7-5, 6-1
2026-08-10vs GarciaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSantiago Murtagh / Chris Boik vs Will Nguyen / Caleb Nielsen4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBryce Hansen / Rodney Ware vs Bruno Garcia / Kaveh Shamloo6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Givens / John Klotz vs Jon Day / Dan Inman3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green Orr2060236
2Luedtke1021331
3Garcia1133657
4Ek Murtagh1124860
5Jensen0112428
6Mandigo02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Chris Boik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Fox
published 3.5
3.18
Rodney Ware
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Bryce Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Andrew Ek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Santiago Murtagh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
John Klotz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Alan Givens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Peter Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Boik + Santiago Murtagh9853% games+4.1% vs expected
Alan Givens + John Klotz0622% games−11.8% vs expected
Rodney Ware + Santiago Murtagh2450% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Ek + Peter Tran134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Boik
24W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
David Fox
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rodney Ware
72W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Bryce Hansen
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Andrew Ek
23W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Santiago Murtagh
41W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
John Klotz
6W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Alan Givens
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Peter Tran
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.