Teams

Luedtke

2026 NE Adult 18&Over Tri-Level · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs JensenLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Adkins / John Larkin vs Daniel Brailita / Johnny Hass7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChris Acker / Chase Woodward vs Wasim Shariff / Brandon Vasholz0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Sanders / Tomiwa Ajayi vs James Merrill / Douglas Stuva2-6, 4-6
2026-08-17vs JensenWon 21
W#1 DoublesChris Snyder / Levi Vogt vs Chad Redding / Sri Vijay Yellepeddi7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJayden Kephart / Tom Seto vs Dale Dixon / Brandon Vasholz6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTomiwa Ajayi / Jeremy Short vs Douglas Stuva / Adam Gouttierre2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green Orr2060236
2Luedtke1021331
3Garcia1133657
4Ek Murtagh1124860
5Jensen0112428
6Mandigo02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Steve Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Chris Acker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Chase Woodward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jayden Kephart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Jason Luedtke
published
3.09
Tom Seto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
John Larkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Jeremy Short
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Chris Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Tomiwa Ajayi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Alexander Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Divya Theja Thota
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Sanders
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3.5
Chris Acker
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Chase Woodward
3W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Jayden Kephart
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Jason Luedtke
15W–25L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Tom Seto
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
John Larkin
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jeremy Short
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Chris Snyder
5W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Tomiwa Ajayi
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Alexander Adkins
10W–12L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Divya Theja Thota
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.