Teams

FOX RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs KNO NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Canetto / Whitney Baylor vs Cierra Olmsted / Barb Richards7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChrissy Musgrove vs Meagan Schreiber6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJaime Martinez / Cheryl Jones vs Linda Prudhomme / Cathy Nowak7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRenee Julien / Jennifer Lobb vs Jessica Hunt / Karla Goodhart6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-07vs LTFC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gilkison / Chrissy Musgrove vs Debbie Murphy / Carol Wood5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShamiree Dillman vs Jessie Lupo6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Canetto / Cheryl Jones vs Jennifer Delaney / Ellen Ribes-Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Lobb / Kathi Engelken vs MaryBeth Doerr / Amber Salwisz3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-30vs SS-LT BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesShamiree Dillman / Kathi Engelken vs Stevie Vencil / Katherine Barnes6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWhitney Baylor vs Stacey Feltman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChrissy Musgrove / Brittany Woolnough vs Christine Gish / Chris Patterson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lobb / Jaime Martinez vs Jennifer Renard / Anastasia Glennie6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-23vs WC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Canetto / Shamiree Dillman vs Kathryn Cullen / Andrea Kolbet6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathi Engelken / Cheryl Jones vs Angela Jones / Taryn Wilson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelissa Gilkison / Brittany Woolnough vs Mary Brady / Karen Steketee6-1, 6-3
2025-06-16vs SS-H YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesShamiree Dillman / Whitney Baylor vs Rebecca McIlwaine / Jennifer Loehr1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelissa Gilkison vs Sheila Salyers4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChrissy Musgrove / Brittany Woolnough vs Tina Burton / Kirsten Mau4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Arnold / Susan Canetto vs Ilana Reed / Debra Sherwood6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2025-06-09vs HW BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gilkison / Renee Julien vs Kristin Martini / Melissa Long5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJaime Martinez / Cheryl Jones vs Katie Dulik / Britta Beblavi6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Canetto / Jennifer Lobb vs Nicki Erdle / Meredith Goss0-6, 3-6
2025-06-02vs HFII REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesWhitney Baylor / Melissa Gilkison vs Dana McHale / Danielle Panzarino7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Canetto vs Sarah Hunter4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJaime Martinez / Kathi Engelken vs Danielle Drohan / Angela Hansen2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChrissy Musgrove / Brittany Woolnough vs Georgeann Doyna / Rachel Nance6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Chrissy Musgrove
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.90
Brittany Woolnough
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Whitney Baylor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.88
Susan Canetto
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Shamiree Dillman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Melissa Gilkison
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.77
Kathi Engelken
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Cheryl Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Jennifer Lobb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chrissy Musgrove + Brittany Woolnough28170% games+12.3% vs expected
Jennifer Lobb + Kathi Engelken9652% games+9.5% vs expected
Jennifer Lobb + Susan Canetto101351% games+8.3% vs expected
Shamiree Dillman + Susan Canetto7453% games+3.6% vs expected
Whitney Baylor + Melissa Gilkison2449% games+2.6% vs expected
Jennifer Lobb + Shamiree Dillman8355% gamesnot enough data
Shamiree Dillman + Kathi Engelken5159% gamesnot enough data
Kathi Engelken + Susan Canetto2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chrissy Musgrove
38W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Brittany Woolnough
30W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Whitney Baylor
78W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Susan Canetto
71W–107L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Shamiree Dillman
67W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Melissa Gilkison
42W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Kathi Engelken
52W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cheryl Jones
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Jennifer Lobb
68W–93L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.