Teams

HFII RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs LTFC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesDanielle Panzarino / Dana McHale vs Elizabeth Stemper / Caren Swan7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Hunter vs Jennifer DeLurgio5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGeorgeann Doyna / Erika Troyer vs Jennifer Delaney / Debbie Murphy2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrigitta Robinson / Colleen Heald vs Amber Salwisz / Elizabeth A Shields0-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs WC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAngela Hansen / Erika Troyer vs Kathleen Bisaccia / Kathryn Cullen4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDanielle Panzarino vs Andrea Kolbet4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana McHale / Stephanie Tomeo vs Brooke Lorenz / Karen Steketee6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrigitta Robinson / Georgeann Doyna vs Angela Jones / Mary Brady1-6, 4-6
2025-06-30vs HW BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesSarah Hunter / Erika Troyer vs Meredith Goss / Melissa Long6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMimi Wong vs Katie Dulik3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Tomeo / Rachel Nance vs Britta Beblavi / Amy MacKey3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDanielle Drohan / Angela Hansen vs Susan Manfredi / Nicki Erdle6-2, 6-0
2025-06-23vs KNO NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesErika Troyer / Dana McHale vs Jane Webster / Barb Richards6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSarah Hunter vs Cathy Nowak7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDanielle Drohan / Angela Hansen vs Cierra Olmsted / Linda Prudhomme5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrigitta Robinson / Colleen Heald vs Jessica Hunt / Karla Goodhart6-2, 7-5
2025-06-16vs SS-LT BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesErika Troyer / Stephanie Tomeo vs Meghan Mariner / Stevie Vencil1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesColleen Heald vs Christine Gish0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Panzarino / Rachel Nance vs Chris Patterson / Katherine Barnes1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrigitta Robinson / Mimi Wong vs Jennifer Renard / Emily Vatter3-6, 2-6
2025-06-09vs SS-H YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hunter / Rachel Nance vs Amy Shearer / Rebecca McIlwaine5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Hansen / Danielle Drohan vs Kirsten Mau / Sheila Salyers6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGeorgeann Doyna / Colleen Heald vs Debra Sherwood / Ilana Reed0-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs FOX REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDana McHale / Danielle Panzarino vs Whitney Baylor / Melissa Gilkison6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Hunter vs Susan Canetto6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDanielle Drohan / Angela Hansen vs Jaime Martinez / Kathi Engelken6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGeorgeann Doyna / Rachel Nance vs Chrissy Musgrove / Brittany Woolnough3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Mimi Wong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.92
Sarah Hunter
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Danielle Panzarino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Erika Troyer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Dana McHale
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Danielle Drohan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Stephanie Tomeo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Angela Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.47
Rachel Nance
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Colleen Heald
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Georgeann Doyna
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.12
Brigitta Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana McHale + Danielle Panzarino8460% games+3.1% vs expected
Danielle Drohan + Angela Hansen5850% games+3.1% vs expected
Dana McHale + Erika Troyer6063% games+2.4% vs expected
Rachel Nance + Stephanie Tomeo3746% games−1.5% vs expected
Brigitta Robinson + Colleen Heald224 matchesnot enough data
Erika Troyer + Sarah Hunter404 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Drohan + Rachel Nance123 matchesnot enough data
Angela Hansen + Stephanie Tomeo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mimi Wong
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Sarah Hunter
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Danielle Panzarino
46W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Erika Troyer
93W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Dana McHale
51W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Danielle Drohan
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Stephanie Tomeo
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Angela Hansen
7W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Rachel Nance
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Colleen Heald
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Georgeann Doyna
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Brigitta Robinson
56W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.