Teams

LCTA18/Keiper/CTC

2022 STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Men 6.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-28vs LCTA18/Zielke/DotyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Smith / Steven Heller vs Gregg Passmore / Marc Spears4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-09vs LCTA18/O'Rourke/MaybankLost 01
L#1 DoublesNathan Dalechek / Adam Smith vs John David Pfile / Tyler Tracy1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-26vs LCTA18/John-Steiner/St AndrewsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Smith / Zahi Jurdi vs Chad Murdock / Bradley Cohen6-7, 3-6
2022-07-19vs LCTA18/Zielke/DotyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Smith / Steven Heller vs David Carter / Nick Suger4-6, 5-7
2022-07-12vs LCTA18/Beck/CTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Smith / Ryan Robinson vs William Hutson / Daniel Lench4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Adam Smith
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.37
William Keiper
published
3.21
Charles Truluck
published 3.5
3.15
John McCormick
published
2.97
Paul Callander
published
2.93
Nathan Dalechek
published
Jeffrey Shealy
published
Ryan Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Truluck + Paul Callander6645% games−3.9% vs expected
Ryan Robinson + John McCormick3355% games−9.9% vs expected
William Keiper + Paul Callander4254% gamesnot enough data
William Keiper + Jeffrey Shealy314 matchesnot enough data
Charles Truluck + William Keiper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Smith
129W–51L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
William Keiper
62W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Charles Truluck
58W–34L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
John McCormick
68W–50L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Paul Callander
22W–36L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Nathan Dalechek
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Jeffrey Shealy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Robinson
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.