Teams

LVTA RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-16vs HMTC YELLOWLost 13
W#1 DoublesEmily Sieg / Susanna Styve vs Elina George / Linda Jirouskova6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelly Blanks vs Kaili Young3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Lodewick / Amy Berkner vs Suzanne Hale / Gail Draper3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Moritz / Erin Hauser-Roe vs Mitzi Johnson / Kimberly Tomlinson2-6, 3-6
2024-07-09vs MEA TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Sieg / Kelly Blanks vs Nora Harrison / Joanna Malo6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSara Chan vs Marisela Cruz6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Arenson / Kim Phillips vs Chris Zwolfer / Holly Brown3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Moritz / Erin Hauser-Roe vs Tanya Saarva / Sue McGee6-3, 6-2
2024-07-02vs LAC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKelsey Keene / Emily Sieg vs Bobbi Billings / Marta Rocha6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKelly Blanks vs Julie Miller2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Moritz / Amy Berkner vs Paloma Lopez / Lynn Schulte6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Lodewick / Erin Hauser-Roe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-25vs RCC GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesEmily Sieg / Susanna Styve vs Emily Pedersen / Stacie Bowman6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSara Chan vs Jessica Ouwerkerk1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Blanks / Kelsey Keene vs Denise Belk / Kristina Brandner5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErin Hauser-Roe / Sarah Lodewick vs Paulette Medley / Katie Johnstone7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-11vs HMTC YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesEmily Sieg / Susanna Styve vs Carmen Kilday / Linda Jirouskova6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSara Chan vs Anita Helin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Phillips / Lynn Arenson vs Suzanne Hale / Elina George3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelsey Keene / Sarah Lodewick vs Kimberly Tomlinson / Karen Wright6-4, 6-2
2024-06-04vs MEA TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Lodewick / Susanna Styve vs Joanna Malo / Lourdes Buck6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Phillips / Lynn Arenson vs Jo Ann Beserra / Holly Brown6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Berkner / Sara Chan vs Jana Krutsinger / Jeanne Cleveland6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SS-LGT BLUE6122615199
2SS-H RED52181027222
3HMTC YELLOW42121228223
4PRC GREEN43161227242
5RRTC RED43171127237
6CACM NAVY43151331242
7BP RED43151332247
8CK GREEN43151335296
9LVTA RED33111327215
10LTFC GREEN34101838263
11JCC BLUE25141434275
12MEA TEAL1571737247
13LAC RED1571739258
14SS-LGT GREEN1642451328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Sarah Lodewick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.28
Susanna Styve
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Kelsey Keene
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Amy Berkner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Kelly Blanks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.96
Emily Sieg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Sara Chan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Lynn Arenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Rebecca Moritz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Kim Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Erin Hauser-Roe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Sieg + Susanna Styve7752% games+2.5% vs expected
Erin Hauser-Roe + Rebecca Moritz3342% games−0.8% vs expected
Lynn Arenson + Kim Phillips3548% games−4.0% vs expected
Kelly Blanks + Kelsey Keene3450% games−5.6% vs expected
Lynn Arenson + Rebecca Moritz224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Berkner + Rebecca Moritz314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Blanks + Rebecca Moritz213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Sieg + Kelsey Keene303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Lodewick
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Susanna Styve
75W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Kelsey Keene
73W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Amy Berkner
100W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Kelly Blanks
9W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Emily Sieg
20W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.96
Sara Chan
16W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.96
4
Lynn Arenson
84W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Rebecca Moritz
55W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Kim Phillips
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Erin Hauser-Roe
107W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.