Teams

MEA TEAL

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-16vs RCC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesJana Krutsinger / Holly Brown vs Sara Palmer / Stacie Bowman4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTanya Saarva / Jo Ann Beserra vs Chelsea Crowell / Tucker Humphrey3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Hawk / Marisela Cruz vs Christine LaBerge / Denise Belk1-6, 1-6
2024-07-09vs LVTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesNora Harrison / Joanna Malo vs Emily Sieg / Kelly Blanks3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMarisela Cruz vs Sara Chan7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChris Zwolfer / Holly Brown vs Lynn Arenson / Kim Phillips6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTanya Saarva / Sue McGee vs Rebecca Moritz / Erin Hauser-Roe3-6, 2-6
2024-07-02vs HMTC YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNora Harrison / Joanna Malo vs Suzanne Hale / Carmen Kilday6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMarisela Cruz vs Kaili Young2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Zwolfer / Jana Krutsinger vs Gail Draper / Karen Wright6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKatie Hawk / Sue McGee vs Mitzi Johnson / Anita Helin3-6, 4-6
2024-06-18vs LAC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesNora Harrison / Joanna Malo vs Julie Miller / Mridula Sugadhan6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeanne Cleveland vs Lori Nothwang2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Saarva / Lourdes Buck vs Marta Rocha / Lynn Schulte7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Zwolfer / Holly Brown vs Bobbi Billings / Laura Waldman6-2, 6-0
2024-06-11vs RCC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesLourdes Buck / Marisela Cruz vs Jessica Ouwerkerk / Sara Palmer1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJo Ann Beserra / Holly Brown vs Denise Belk / Chelsea Crowell1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Hawk / Sue McGee vs Paulette Medley / Katie Johnstone0-6, 4-6
2024-06-04vs LVTA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoanna Malo / Lourdes Buck vs Sarah Lodewick / Susanna Styve4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJo Ann Beserra / Holly Brown vs Kim Phillips / Lynn Arenson4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJana Krutsinger / Jeanne Cleveland vs Amy Berkner / Sara Chan4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SS-LGT BLUE6122615199
2SS-H RED52181027222
3HMTC YELLOW42121228223
4PRC GREEN43161227242
5RRTC RED43171127237
6CACM NAVY43151331242
7BP RED43151332247
8CK GREEN43151335296
9LVTA RED33111327215
10LTFC GREEN34101838263
11JCC BLUE25141434275
12MEA TEAL1571737247
13LAC RED1571739258
14SS-LGT GREEN1642451328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Zwolfer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Jana Krutsinger
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Tanya Saarva
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Marisela Cruz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.99
Katie Hawk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Holly Brown
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.90
Lourdes Buck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Sue McGee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jeanne Cleveland
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jo Ann Beserra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joanna Malo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nora Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Hawk + Marisela Cruz5154% games−0.8% vs expected
Holly Brown + Jo Ann Beserra134 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Saarva + Sue McGee134 matchesnot enough data
Jana Krutsinger + Holly Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Holly Brown + Sue McGee033 matchesnot enough data
Nora Harrison + Joanna Malo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Zwolfer
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jana Krutsinger
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Tanya Saarva
35W–75L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
4
Marisela Cruz
65W–45L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Katie Hawk
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Holly Brown
11W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.92
Lourdes Buck
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Sue McGee
6W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Jeanne Cleveland
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jo Ann Beserra
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joanna Malo
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nora Harrison
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.