Teams

CCW HIPPE

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-16vs MEMPK MCCARRONSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSara Michon / Daniel Michon vs Sheldon Chinnery / Kayla Breedlove4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Borden / David Illsley vs Abigail Martin / Nicholas Libarios3-6, 2-6
2021-05-09vs LTFCS ORTON-URBINAWon 10
W#3 DoublesSara Michon / Daniel Michon vs Bill Bricking / Tatiana Merkoulova6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-02vs CSRC CARPENTERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesWendy Jones / David Illsley vs Sandra Cook / Zachary Carpenter5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLeslie Brewer / Daniel Michon vs Carolayne Henry / Doug Baker7-5, 6-2
2021-04-18vs LTFCS ORTON-URBINAWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Michon / David StClair vs Bill Bricking / Tatiana Merkoulova6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Michon / Katie Borden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-11vs CSRC CARPENTERLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Borden / David Illsley vs Jennifer Mutka / Austin Carpenter3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
David Illsley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Daniel Michon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
David StClair
published 4
3.71
Wayne Mo
published 4
3.67
Leslie Brewer
published
3.63
John Whipple
published
3.46
Sara Michon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Katie Borden
published
Susan Hippe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Michon + Daniel Michon152246% games−1.4% vs expected
John Whipple + Leslie Brewer213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Michon + Leslie Brewer213 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Mo + Leslie Brewer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Illsley
101W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Daniel Michon
98W–79L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
David StClair
14W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Wayne Mo
45W–40L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Leslie Brewer
24W–25L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
John Whipple
70W–40L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Sara Michon
83W–94L career · 3 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
3.46
Katie Borden
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Hippe
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.