Teams

CSRC CARPENTER

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-16vs LTFCS ORTON-URBINAWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mutka / Austin Carpenter vs Tatiana Merkoulova / Bill Bricking6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Doug Baker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-09vs MEMPK MCCARRONWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mutka / Austin Carpenter vs Cheryl Gorthy / Rudy Abcede6-2, 6-2
2021-05-02vs CCW HIPPELost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Doug Baker vs Leslie Brewer / Daniel Michon5-7, 2-6
2021-04-25vs LTFCS ORTON-URBINAWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Doug Baker vs Bill Bricking / Tatiana Merkoulova7-5, 7-5
2021-04-18vs MEMPK MCCARRONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mutka / Zachary Carpenter vs Kayla Breedlove / Thomas Owens6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolayne Henry / Doug Baker vs Abigail Martin / Nicholas Libarios6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-11vs CCW HIPPEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mutka / Austin Carpenter vs Katie Borden / David Illsley6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Zachary Carpenter
published
3.80
Austin Carpenter
published 4
3.77
MICHAEL REECE
published
3.76
Jennifer Mutka
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Carolayne Henry
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Patty Carpenter
published
Doug Baker
published
Sandra Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin Carpenter + Jennifer Mutka13358% games+11.7% vs expected
Patty Carpenter + Zachary Carpenter10954% games+5.1% vs expected
Carolayne Henry + Austin Carpenter6254% games+2.7% vs expected
Sandra Cook + Zachary Carpenter2450% gamesnot enough data
Patty Carpenter + Austin Carpenter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Carpenter
64W–40L career · no lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Austin Carpenter
64W–28L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
MICHAEL REECE
60W–46L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jennifer Mutka
66W–45L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Carolayne Henry
122W–137L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Patty Carpenter
46W–60L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.67
Doug Baker
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Cook
24W–31L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.