Teams

5.TOC.Stogner

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-16vs 2.TOC.NealisWon 21
W#1 DoublesCraig Brehmer / Ben Desonglo vs Chad Pastoor / Charles Gordon7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJason Widen / Micah Widen vs Thomas Steet / Chris Johnson7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Heinz / Mohammed Dessouky vs Scott Daniel / Cameron Leggett2-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs 3.TOC.PuriWon 21
W#1 DoublesMicah Widen / Craig Brehmer vs Dharam Bhat / Vishal Gupta6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBen Desonglo / Peter Olmos vs Nishant Puri / Vijay Sharma1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJeff Heinz vs Nitni Agrawal6-2, 7-6
2022-03-27Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Widen / Micah Widen vs Bhaswanth Chava / SRINIVASRAGHAVA SURENDRA2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPeter Olmos / Jeff Heinz vs John Doe / Sam Kasarla3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-20Won 20
W#2 SinglesJeff Heinz vs Karthik Sekar7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBen Desonglo / Mohammed Dessouky vs Aaron Watson / Mahesh Shiv6-2, 6-4
2022-03-13vs 2.TOC.NealisLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaul Lebiecz / Jeff Heinz vs Chris Johnson / Cameron Leggett2-6, 3-6
2022-03-02vs 1.KF.DewberryLost 02
L#1 DoublesMicah Widen / Jason Widen vs Rob Dewberry / Thomas Newton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBen Desonglo / Ronald Stogner vs Jimmy Lewis / Zachary Zeidler1-6, 3-6
2022-02-20vs 4.TOC.PuttojuLost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Widen / Micah Widen vs Venugopal Mallarapu / Ananth Chilakamarri2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.54
Micah Widen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Matthew Capobianco
published
3.36
Craig Brehmer
published 3.5
3.25
Todd Bachman
published
3.13
Jason Widen
published
3.03
Ben Desonglo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Paul Lebiecz
published
2.90
Jeff Heinz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.83
Peter Olmos
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maxwell Gregson
25W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Micah Widen
49W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Matthew Capobianco
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Craig Brehmer
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Todd Bachman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jason Widen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ben Desonglo
94W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Paul Lebiecz
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Jeff Heinz
41W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Peter Olmos
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.