Teams

2.TOC.Nealis

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-16vs 5.TOC.StognerWon 10
W#2 SinglesIvan Andjelkovic vs Peter Olmos6-0, 6-1
2022-03-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichael Pournaras vs Thomas Newton6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-20vs 4.TOC.PuttojuWon 20
W#1 SinglesIvan Andjelkovic vs Ghanshyamsinh Gohil7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Pournaras vs Pavan Karnam6-3, 6-0
2022-03-12vs 3.TOC.PuriWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Pournaras vs Sushrut Bhowmik6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-20vs 1.KF.DewberryWon 10
W#2 SinglesIvan Andjelkovic vs Zachary Zeidler7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
John Nealis
published
3.53
Charles Gordon
published 3.5
3.46
Michael Pournaras
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.44
Ryan Goff
published
3.32
Taylor VICK
published
3.29
Cameron Leggett
published 3.5
3.24
Ivan Andjelkovic
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Thomas Steet
published
2.97
Scott Daniel
published
2.95
Nicholas Broccolo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Goff + Charles Gordon2743% games−5.7% vs expected
John Nealis + Taylor VICK033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Nealis
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Charles Gordon
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Michael Pournaras
83W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Ryan Goff
14W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Taylor VICK
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Cameron Leggett
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Ivan Andjelkovic
143W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Thomas Steet
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Nicholas Broccolo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.