Teams

Heritage Bay - Beaudet

2025 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-13vs Quail West / P. DavisWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Sturges / Susie Beaudet vs Suzi O'Connell / Jill Teberg6-3, 6-1
2025-03-04vs Olde Cypress / LoomisWon 10
W#1 DoublesLucy Slaboch / Sharon Sturges vs Heather Cook / Susan Reedy6-3, 6-0
2025-02-26vs Pelican Bay North / BehmararmLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Cortese / Mary Varilek vs Denna Saidnawey / Sue Malek5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Seeley vs Margaret Izzo6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeather Larkin / Mia Delk vs Behnoosh Behmaram / Susan Fasig2-6, 4-6
2025-02-12vs GreyHawk / LafontaineLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Varilek / Sharon Sturges vs Lesley Kranites / Gail Oroho6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-05vs Quail West / P. DavisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudy Leventhal / Arlyn Amsellem vs Colleen Bresson / Jennifer Koivu6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSusan Seeley vs Jane Mills7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMia Delk / Heather Larkin vs Suzi O'Connell / Michelle Minor1-6, 1-6
2025-01-30vs Fiddlers Creek / BoneventoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudy Leventhal / Arlyn Amsellem vs Laura Fischer / Laraine Segar3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Varilek / Natalie Cortese vs Lisa LaSpina Bonevento / Jennifer Bauer6-4, 6-4
2025-01-29vs /Marco YMCA / BurschSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArlyn Amsellem / Judy Leventhal vs Lisa Campbell / Susan Julich3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSharon Sturges / Krista Lombardo vs Deb Dorsey / Paula Turkiewicz6-0, 7-6
2025-01-15vs Pelican Bay North / BehmararmWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudy Leventhal / Arlyn Amsellem vs Tamara Durante / Kate Wagner7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Sharon Sturges
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
Zoe Lefort
published
3.48
Melody Miller
published
3.48
Diane Janiec
published 3.5
3.42
Krista Lombardo
published
3.37
Susie Beaudet
published
3.37
Lucy Slaboch
published
3.33
Mary Varilek
published
3.31
Mia Delk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Susan Seeley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Arlyn Amsellem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Heather Larkin
published
3.27
Judy Leventhal
published
3.26
Gabriela Chahwan
published
3.24
Tina Jaquess
published
3.19
Maristela Battilana
published
3.10
Victoria Pollock
published
3.06
Kim Swope Schott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arlyn Amsellem + Natalie Cortese7160% games+8.1% vs expected
Tina Jaquess + Victoria Pollock3447% games−6.9% vs expected
Gabriela Chahwan + Mia Delk224 matchesnot enough data
Gabriela Chahwan + Maristela Battilana134 matchesnot enough data
Arlyn Amsellem + Mary Varilek123 matchesnot enough data
Krista Lombardo + Maristela Battilana303 matchesnot enough data
Susie Beaudet + Sharon Sturges213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sharon Sturges
85W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Zoe Lefort
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Melody Miller
31W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Diane Janiec
34W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Krista Lombardo
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lucy Slaboch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Mary Varilek
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–303L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Susan Seeley
91W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Arlyn Amsellem
52W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Heather Larkin
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Judy Leventhal
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Gabriela Chahwan
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Tina Jaquess
105W–80L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Maristela Battilana
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Kim Swope Schott
23W–28L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.