Teams

GreyHawk / Lafontaine

2025 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-12vs Olde Cypress / LoomisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMara Williams / Laura Haney vs Carol Cohen / Rosemary Rolak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Byanski / Gail Oroho vs Nora Slusar / Denise Reilly4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-11vs Fiddlers Creek / BoneventoWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaureen Dougherty / Jill Arnese vs Vicky Ramuta / Claudette Workman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Byanski / Laura Haney vs Sarah Ives / Cathlin Thompson6-3, 6-3
2025-02-25vs Pelican Bay North / BehmararmLost 13
L#1 DoublesGail Oroho / Laura Haney vs Tamara Durante / Denna Saidnawey1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Maggal vs Stephanie Castaldo6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Byanski / Sharon Herbst vs Toni Marie Silverman / Sharon Bartle4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Lafontaine / Jodi Saxman vs Judi Howard / Danielle Sherwood6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-12vs Heritage Bay - BeaudetWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Haney / Mara Williams vs Patricia Gill / Kim Swope Schott6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Maggal vs Zoe Lefort4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Kranites / Gail Oroho vs Mary Varilek / Sharon Sturges4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJill Arnese / Maureen Dougherty vs Gabriela Chahwan / Maristela Battilana3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-05vs Olde Cypress / LoomisWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Byanski / Mara Williams vs Tammy Boone / Heather Cook3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Maggal vs Anastasia Brooks6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLesley Kranites / Laura Haney vs Corey Stranger / Nora Slusar7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-22vs Quail West / P. DavisWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Jodi Saxman vs Leslie Martin / Karen Romine5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-15vs /Marco YMCA / BurschLost 02
L#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Maria Lafontaine vs Inge Lund / Lisa Campbell3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSara Martineson / Patty McManus vs Kathryn Breault / Jennifer Stonebreaker3-6, 5-7
2025-01-08vs Fiddlers Creek / BoneventoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichelle Maggal vs Lisa LaSpina Bonevento6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Lesley Kranites vs Linda Keely / Michelle Trapani6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Lisa Byanski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Sara Martineson
published
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.28
Jill Arnese
published
3.27
Mara Williams
published
3.21
Maureen Dougherty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Gail Oroho
published 3.5
3.18
Maria Lafontaine
published
3.15
Sonja Pound
published
3.14
Sharon Herbst
published
2.91
Jodi Saxman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Lesley Kranites
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Margaret Caccia
published
Marketa Dieckmann
published
Patty McManus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rosemary Cronin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Lafontaine + Sharon Herbst3251% games+8.1% vs expected
Jill Arnese + Mara Williams7355% games+5.3% vs expected
Maureen Dougherty + Jill Arnese2352% games+3.4% vs expected
Jodi Saxman + Laura Haney5643% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Kranites + Michelle Maggal3347% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Kranites + Lisa Byanski3258% gamesnot enough data
Patty McManus + Sara Martineson224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Haney + Lisa Byanski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Byanski
126W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Sara Martineson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
Jill Arnese
33W–22L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Mara Williams
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Maureen Dougherty
30W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Gail Oroho
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Maria Lafontaine
5W–18L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Sonja Pound
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sharon Herbst
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Jodi Saxman
28W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.91
Lesley Kranites
56W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.90
Margaret Caccia
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marketa Dieckmann
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty McManus
38W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Cronin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.