Teams

Bray/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-28vs Mohler/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesJason Downs / Frank Robilio vs Jay Thakkar / John Stukenborg6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSamuel Corcoran vs Scott Hirsch1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBill Clark / John Mikl vs Xiangxia Liu / Alan Moore6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBrandon Brackett vs Michael Wittke6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Winstead / John Manshack vs Michael Mohler / Ryan Aghabeg6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Peyton Neal
published
3.60
Brandon Brackett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Jonathan Jussely
published
3.39
Seunghyun Jung
published
3.31
Jason Downs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Frank Robilio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
John Manshack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Santhosh Dinakaran
published
3.03
William Winstead
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Bill Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
John Mikl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Samuel Corcoran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Corey Richter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
2.71
David Bray
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peyton Neal + Brandon Brackett5072% games+18.3% vs expected
Jason Downs + Frank Robilio3443% games−4.5% vs expected
John Manshack + William Winstead5079% gamesnot enough data
John Mikl + Peyton Neal303 matchesnot enough data
John Mikl + Brandon Brackett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peyton Neal
27W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.79
3.5
Brandon Brackett
43W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Jonathan Jussely
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Seunghyun Jung
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jason Downs
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Frank Robilio
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
John Manshack
40W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Santhosh Dinakaran
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
William Winstead
32W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Bill Clark
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
John Mikl
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Samuel Corcoran
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Corey Richter
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Christopher Heimann
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
David Bray
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.