← Search

John Manshack

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cordova, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 142W–65L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history207 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Bray/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Davidoff
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-21 · Coopwood/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dayou Yu
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · Coopwood/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Coopwood
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-12 · Coopwood/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Coopwood
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-11 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Coopwood championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-10 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Coopwood championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-10 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Coopwood championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Coopwood championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-09 · Brackett/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Coopwood championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-23 · Bray/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jonathan Jussely
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-20 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabe LaBonia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-19 · Bray/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jonathan Jussely
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
74.1%
86W–30L · 58.5% of games
3.5
56.8%
21W–16L · 51.1% of games
6.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 55.3% of games
3.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 64.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer