Teams

Centercourt Florham Park

2025 18&over Women Day Winter · 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-25vs NJ: Shot GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine McMahon / Kimberly Smith vs Jamie Kovac / Maya Furumoto0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesPraxedes Molina vs Hannah Finkelberg1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLorry Hill / Soojan Shao vs Paula Loeb / Iris Jungherr2-6, 3-6
2025-03-13vs WestfieldWon 10
W#2 DoublesSoojan Shao / Bibi Lipton vs Rachel Perlman / Jenny Madden6-3, 6-4
2025-02-27vs Murray HillLost 01
L#2 DoublesLorry Hill / Sheila Deguines vs Abby Manning / Stella Kapur6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-30vs Over ServedLost 01
L#2 DoublesRocio Aliaga Yermack / Bibi Lipton vs Daryl Caiola / Michelle Brindle6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-01-16vs Double TroubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesSARAH PLEVINSKY / Sheila Deguines vs Janet Himstead / Esther Wendling7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Jessica Tyo
published
3.32
Sheila Deguines
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Barbara Sullivan
published 3.5
Amy Shoemaker
published 3.5
Andrea Levinson
published 3.5
Catherine McMahon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debby Fazendeiro
published 3.5
3.01
Marci Gorman
published
2.99
Praxedes Molina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Bibi Lipton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janet Porto
published
KAREN BRENNFLECK
published
Kimberly Smith
published
Lorry Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Holzer
published
SARAH PLEVINSKY
published
Soojan Shao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Victoria Vigil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debby Fazendeiro + Andrea Levinson6159% games+3.0% vs expected
Janet Porto + Lorry Hill8460% games+2.6% vs expected
Sheila Deguines + Victoria Vigil9064% games+1.7% vs expected
Jessica Tyo + Andrea Levinson3354% games+0.9% vs expected
Debby Fazendeiro + Catherine McMahon13462% games+0.2% vs expected
Barbara Sullivan + Catherine McMahon3354% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Deguines + Andrea Levinson4261% gamesnot enough data
Debby Fazendeiro + KAREN BRENNFLECK224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Tyo
39W–29L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Sheila Deguines
135W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Sullivan
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Amy Shoemaker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Levinson
50W–40L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine McMahon
44W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debby Fazendeiro
37W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marci Gorman
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Praxedes Molina
49W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Bibi Lipton
58W–139L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Janet Porto
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
KAREN BRENNFLECK
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Smith
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorry Hill
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Holzer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocio Aliaga Yermack
40W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
SARAH PLEVINSKY
7W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Soojan Shao
35W–73L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Vigil
35W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.