Teams

CACM RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs APR REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSean Essex / Tom Weaver vs William Mahaffy / Bruce Eldredge6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTim Hester vs Sebastian DeBenedittis7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Berglund / Dirk McDermott vs Kevin Matney / Noel Williams6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-11vs GPTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrent Slosky / Hervey Pierre vs Eric Kurtz / Eric Clayman6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDirk McDermott vs Andres Seijas4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBrian Berglund / Sean Essex vs Josh Lozow / Boyce Markham6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Sanders / Tom Weaver vs Thane Benedict / John McManemin6-1, 6-3
2022-07-04vs SKY REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSean Essex / Tim Hester vs Ned Rule / Kevin Breault6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHervey Pierre vs Daniel Cho5-7, 5-4
W#2 DoublesDirk McDermott / Brent Slosky vs Coupar Lester / Neal OConnor7-5, 6-2
2022-06-27vs GTC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesSean Essex / Tim Hester vs Suresh Gevaran / Roger Montoya6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDirk McDermott vs Ron Satha6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephen Clarke / Hervey Pierre vs Gary Abrams / David Baker7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Berglund / Tom Weaver vs Daniel Stover / Barry Jerebker6-4, 6-0
2022-06-20vs DTC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesSean Essex / Tim Hester vs Paul Suter / Steven Ellstrom6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGabriel Neises vs Jeremiah Baronberg6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHervey Pierre / Brent Slosky vs William Nelson / Steven Blumberg6-1, 3-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Sanders / Stephen Clarke vs David Turner / Curtis Turner6-3, 6-4
2022-06-13vs CP BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesSean Essex / Tim Hester vs Kendall Lin / Eric Eiteljorg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHervey Pierre vs Brandon Frawley7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDirk McDermott / Brent Slosky vs Thorn Luth / David Morrison6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Wylie / Tom Weaver vs Jeremy Carman / Tony Church3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-06vs CM GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrent Slosky / Dirk McDermott vs Paul Gillis / Stan Goodreau7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTim Hester vs Brian Turner7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Berglund / Sean Essex vs Tim Fitz / Jeff Robert6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Clarke / Michael Sanders vs Eli Anderson / Bruce Anderson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Thomas Tsai
published
3.93
Hervey Pierre
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.91
Brian Berglund
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Tim Hester
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.87
Dirk McDermott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Brent Slosky
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
Michael Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gabriel Neises
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sean Essex
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Stephen Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tom Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Essex + Tom Weaver5062% games−0.1% vs expected
Tim Hester + Sean Essex7063% games−0.3% vs expected
Brian Berglund + Dirk McDermott314 matchesnot enough data
Brian Berglund + Michael Sanders213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Berglund + Hervey Pierre303 matchesnot enough data
Brian Berglund + Tom Weaver213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Sanders + Stephen Clarke303 matchesnot enough data
Brent Slosky + Sean Essex123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Tsai
52W–28L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Hervey Pierre
86W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Brian Berglund
154W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Tim Hester
37W–18L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Dirk McDermott
150W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Brent Slosky
39W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Sanders
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Gabriel Neises
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sean Essex
57W–15L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Clarke
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Weaver
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.