Teams

SWW-Devore

2023 One Doubles-Winter · 4.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-25vs FoothLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Byrum / Molly Canada vs Hana Farr / Sarah Footh3-6, 4-6
2023-02-28vs FoothWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalia Devore / Candace Hines vs Hana Farr / Sarah Footh6-2, 6-4
2023-02-16vs Oly HoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCandace Hines / Molly Canada vs Kenna Canaan / Tracey Hoy6-1, 7-5
2023-02-15vs Oly HoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Byrum / Natalia Devore vs Kenna Canaan / Tracey Hoy2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-14vs Oly HoyWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalia Devore / Candace Hines vs Kenna Canaan / Tracey Hoy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Devore4242654
2Footh2424854

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Natalia Devore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Molly Canada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Angela Byrum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Candace Hines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Hines + Natalia Devore7165% games+9.7% vs expected
Molly Canada + Natalia Devore331357% games+2.6% vs expected
Candace Hines + Angela Byrum4453% games+0.6% vs expected
Molly Canada + Angela Byrum2349% games−6.8% vs expected
Angela Byrum + Natalia Devore2346% games−9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Natalia Devore
168W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Molly Canada
93W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Angela Byrum
212W–122L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Candace Hines
126W–120L career · 3 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.