Teams

Edwards/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-19vs Sones/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesHolly Cousar / Emily Sadlow vs Grier Stokes / Teresa Sweeney6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMelanie Schrank vs Robyn Jones2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChancey Thompson / Jami Feinberg vs Lauren Douglass / Casey Gleysteen6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAllison Jones vs Elizabeth Domas6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Roedel / Rachel Montague vs Carol Fields / Caroline Sones6-1, 6-1
2024-11-14vs Ewing/MemphisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAllison Jones / Emily Sadlow vs Allison Ewing / Michele Thomas7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSophie Edwards / Melody Greene vs Andrea Harano / Lauren Barnett6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMelanie Schrank vs Hallie Bauer6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChancey Thompson / Kelly Irvine vs Ami Tasker / Tanya Myers4-6, 1-6
2024-10-25vs Murphy/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJami Feinberg / Kelly Irvine vs Bonnie Price / Mickey Obenour1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMelanie Schrank vs Stacy Oswalt6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChancey Thompson / Rachel Montague vs Cheryl Murphy / Sonya Fleck0-6, 3-6
2024-10-24vs James/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelody Greene / Allison Jones vs Lisa James / Staci Gill3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSophie Edwards vs Tammy Smalley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJami Feinberg / Diana Roedel vs Melanie Gutierrez / Lynn O'Neill1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHolly Cousar / Chancey Thompson vs Jamie Harris / Shawnelle Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-22vs Carpenter/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesSophie Edwards / Emily Sadlow vs Julie Umansky / Stephanie Bailey6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHolly Cousar / Jami Feinberg vs Kimberly Hester / Rebecca Slater2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRachel Montague / Martha Carter vs Jamie Hunt / Jessica Maxwell7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Sophie Edwards
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Emily Sadlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Melanie Schrank
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Allison Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Rachel Montague
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.71
Diana Roedel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Holly Cousar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Chancey Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.55
Jami Feinberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Melody Greene
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Martha Carter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chancey Thompson + Holly Cousar303 matchesnot enough data
Chancey Thompson + Jami Feinberg213 matchesnot enough data
Jami Feinberg + Melanie Schrank213 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Montague + Martha Carter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophie Edwards
30W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Emily Sadlow
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Melanie Schrank
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Allison Jones
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Rachel Montague
19W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Diana Roedel
18W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Holly Cousar
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%7%93%
2.71
3
Chancey Thompson
22W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Jami Feinberg
20W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Melody Greene
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Martha Carter
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.