Teams

HTP

2021 40&Over Mixed · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-30vs NJ: Tennis4LifeWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrancois Fournier / Hazel-Ann Rodney vs Brian Lamon / Linh Fruge6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMeng Zhang / Sam Doctor vs Olga Carey / Jaiganesh Narasimhamoorthy6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Wilhelm / Lisa Engel vs Dan Khoo / Elme Schmid7-6, 4-3
2021-04-23vs NJ: Tennis4LifeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Chung / Wazim Khan vs Chanaka Amarasinghe / Jamie Wasserman6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Wilhelm / Meng Zhang vs Brigette Elaina Brooks / Rodrigo Roa6-7, 1-4
2021-04-16vs NJ: Tennis4LifeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Chung / Wazim Khan vs Chanaka Amarasinghe / Jamie Wasserman6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFrancois Fournier / Hazel-Ann Rodney vs Alan Howard / Allison Bloch6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Engel / Sam Doctor vs Egbert Baldovino / Kristina Baldovino3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-09vs NJ: Tennis4LifeLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeng Zhang / William Wilhelm vs Lars Bohn / Christina Bohn2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Jacobus / Barbara Jacobus vs Alan Howard / Allison Bloch7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-02vs NJ: Tennis4LifeWon 20
W#2 DoublesPhilip Oh / Hazel-Ann Rodney vs Dan Khoo / Elme Schmid7-6, 4-3
W#3 DoublesMeng Zhang / Sam Doctor vs Egbert Baldovino / Kristina Baldovino6-4, 6-4
2021-03-26vs NJ: Tennis4LifeLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Oh / Michelle Chung vs Lars Bohn / Christina Bohn0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Jacobus / Barbara Jacobus vs Jigar Shah / Jayamadhuri Ghosh5-7, 0-6
2021-03-19vs NJ: Tennis4LifeWon 21
W#1 DoublesHazel-Ann Rodney / Wazim Khan vs Olga Carey / Rodrigo Roa3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHarold Stern / Bonnie Lidz vs Daniel Hudec / JANET van MOL3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Fiske / Sam Doctor vs Jaiganesh Narasimhamoorthy / Brigette Elaina Brooks6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-03-14vs NJ: Tennis4LifeLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatias Diez / Laura Fiske vs Brian Lamon / Linh Fruge6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Engel / William Wilhelm vs Jayamadhuri Ghosh / Jigar Shah2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Chung / Wazim Khan vs Chanaka Amarasinghe / Elme Schmid6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: Tennis4Life0815923195
2HTP0891532253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Geoffrey Jacobson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Laura Fiske
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Damon Roth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Lisa Engel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Francois Fournier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Harold Stern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Matias Diez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Michelle Chung
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Hazel-Ann Rodney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Ingrid Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Barbara Jacobus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Meng Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Philip Oh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Wazim Khan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wazim Khan + Michelle Chung4552% gamesnot enough data
Wazim Khan + Hazel-Ann Rodney5256% gamesnot enough data
Ingrid Floyd + Damon Roth6057% gamesnot enough data
Geoffrey Jacobson + Ingrid Floyd033 matchesnot enough data
Laura Fiske + Matias Diez123 matchesnot enough data
Francois Fournier + Hazel-Ann Rodney213 matchesnot enough data
Philip Oh + Michelle Chung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Geoffrey Jacobson
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Laura Fiske
121W–91L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Damon Roth
27W–8L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Engel
56W–43L career · 3 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Francois Fournier
58W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Harold Stern
67W–74L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.52
Matias Diez
30W–9L career · 1 line in 2021
44%55%<1%
3.52
Michelle Chung
41W–27L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Hazel-Ann Rodney
116W–99L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ingrid Floyd
201W–228L career · 4 lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Barbara Jacobus
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Meng Zhang
18W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Philip Oh
44W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wazim Khan
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.