Teams

HF YELLOW

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

13 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-03vs HFII REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie Moss / Megan Barley vs Tracy Rutz / Meghan Pomeroy3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBetsy Maletz vs Marsha Visscher6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesToni Beck / Katie Gordon vs Laura Wright / Adrienne Grady7-6, 6-1
2025-09-02vs LTFC TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Gordon / Megan Barley vs Andrea Starlin / Nikki Vivion1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Bischoff vs Brigitta Robinson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Glover / Lyndsie VandenBerg vs Marisa Wong / Grozdana Micic2-6, 2-6
2025-08-13vs HV REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSarah Glover / Betsy Maletz vs Kellina Flansburg / Lauren Barela6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHayley Hiner / Lyndsie VandenBerg vs Melissa Easterly / Laura Conry2-6, 3-6
2025-08-06vs EM BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesToni Beck / Hayley Hiner vs Molly McGill / Molly Walsh2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Gordon vs Jennifer Wink2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Isham / Emily Bischoff vs Amy Dodge / Kristen Mancherian1-6, 3-6
2025-07-30vs KNO SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeddie Bruno / Hayley Hiner vs Diane Klepacka / Katrina Prutch3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCassie Zabor vs Rebecca Fanning1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Bischoff / Carrie Moss vs Danielle Gloege / Julie Madden5-7, 1-6
2025-07-25vs HW NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesMegan Barley / Susan Davis vs Christa Goldstein / Michelle Winiarski7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Katie Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Betsy Maletz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.59
Sarah Glover
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Teddie Bruno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Cassie Zabor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Emily Bischoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.27
Megan Barley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Carrie Moss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.18
Sydni Sachs
published
2.16
Toni Beck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Hayley Hiner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Lyndsie VandenBerg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.95
Kelly Isham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Beck + Kelly Isham3353% games+11.9% vs expected
Megan Barley + Hayley Hiner3344% games−0.8% vs expected
Megan Barley + Katie Gordon3254% games−1.4% vs expected
Carrie Moss + Sarah Glover4261% gamesnot enough data
Emily Bischoff + Hayley Hiner4153% gamesnot enough data
Emily Bischoff + Carrie Moss213 matchesnot enough data
Lyndsie VandenBerg + Sydni Sachs303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Gordon
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.86
3
Betsy Maletz
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Glover
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Teddie Bruno
17W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
2.5
Cassie Zabor
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
Emily Bischoff
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Megan Barley
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Carrie Moss
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Sydni Sachs
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Toni Beck
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Hayley Hiner
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Lyndsie VandenBerg
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Kelly Isham
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.