Teams

HFII RED

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-03vs HF YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesTracy Rutz / Meghan Pomeroy vs Carrie Moss / Megan Barley6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMarsha Visscher vs Betsy Maletz2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Wright / Adrienne Grady vs Toni Beck / Katie Gordon6-7, 1-6
2025-09-01vs HV REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaura Wright / Adrienne Grady vs Susan Payne / Wendy Stookesberry1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKathleen Maddock vs Kellina Flansburg6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMeghan Pomeroy / Susan Boggs vs Lauren Barela / Stephanie Segal6-3, 6-1
2025-08-20vs EM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Wright / Maria Shea vs Amy Dodge / Kristen Mancherian3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Pomeroy vs Elizabeth Sundberg2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Rutz / Sara Haynes vs Molly McGill / Molly Walsh1-6, 2-6
2025-08-13vs KNO SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTracy Rutz / Maria Shea vs Molly Ehlinger / Diane Klepacka6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarsha Visscher vs Rebecca Fanning0-6, 1-6
2025-08-06vs HW NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMeghan Pomeroy / Adrienne Grady vs Christa Goldstein / Kristin McCartin6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Rutz / Susan Boggs vs Natalie Jacobsen / Michelle Winiarski6-1, 6-1
2025-07-23vs LTFC TEALSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSara Haynes / Kathleen Maddock vs Andrea Starlin / Julie Thorn6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMaria Shea / Susan Boggs vs Marisa Wong / Grozdana Micic3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Maria Shea
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Laura Wright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Marsha Visscher
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Tracy Rutz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Susan Boggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Adrienne Grady
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Meghan Pomeroy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathleen Maddock
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Shea + Marsha Visscher7558% games+5.2% vs expected
Susan Boggs + Tracy Rutz3650% games+2.1% vs expected
Adrienne Grady + Laura Wright0528% gamesnot enough data
Susan Boggs + Meghan Pomeroy213 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Rutz + Maria Shea303 matchesnot enough data
Adrienne Grady + Meghan Pomeroy033 matchesnot enough data
Laura Wright + Meghan Pomeroy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Maria Shea
40W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Laura Wright
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Marsha Visscher
42W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Tracy Rutz
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Susan Boggs
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Adrienne Grady
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Meghan Pomeroy
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Kathleen Maddock
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.