Teams

R&J - Team C

2024 Yadkin Valley Racquets and Jackets · Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-17vs R&J - Team BSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Mills / Betty Haggard vs Pamela Jackson / Hillary Stevens3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJoAnn White / Hannah Giles vs Nora Ferrell / Amy Backus6-1, 6-1
2024-12-14vs R&J - Team AWon 10
W#1 DoublesHannah Giles / Betty Haggard vs Sarah Kaplan / Claire Devon2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-12-07vs R&J - Team DWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoAnn White / Laura Harvey vs Felice Manget Harvey / Christina Soriano6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmy Mills / Hannah Giles vs Mariela Arias / Olivia Calisi6-2, 6-2
2024-11-16vs R&J - Team ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Long / Hannah Giles vs Nancy Hart / Sarah Kaplan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-09vs R&J - Team DWon 10
W#2 DoublesHannah Giles / Julie Long vs Mariela Arias / Samantha Talbott6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Hannah Giles
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
JoAnn White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Julie Long
published
3.01
Emily Shute
published 3.5
2.95
Betty Haggard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amy Mills
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JoAnn White + Hannah Giles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Giles
38W–3L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.67
JoAnn White
39W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Julie Long
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Emily Shute
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Amy Mills
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.